CRM-M-8286-2024 #1# IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. CRM-M-8286-2024 Date of Decision:-28.08.2025 Surjit Singh. ......Petitioner. Vs. State of Punjab & Anr. ......Respondent. CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASJIT SINGH BEDI Present:- Ms. Sushma Chopra, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. M.S. Toor, AAG Punjab. Mr. Inderpal Singh, Advocate for respondent no.2. *** JASJIT SINGH BEDI, J.(ORAL) The prayer in this petition under Section 482 Cr.PC is for quashing of the FIR No.210 dated 04.08.2009 under Sections 326, 324, 323, 427, 506, 148, 149 IPC (Section 326 added later on) registered at P.S. Banga, District Nawanshahar along with subsequent and consequential proceedings arising out of the above said FIR including the order dated 22.11.2022 whereby proclamation has been issued against the petitioner. 2. The brief facts of the case are that the aforementioned FIR was registered against the petitioner and certain other accused at the instance of respondent no.2-Amandeep Singh @ Rimpy. The petitioner was declared a proclaimed offender on 03.03.2012. Subsequently, he filed a petition for quashing of the FIR. This court vide order dated 09.08.2012 (Annexure P-4) quashed the said FIR. VINAY MAHAJAN 2025.08.29 15:31 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-8286-2024 #2# 3. The Complainant filed an SLP(Crl.) Nos. 5131-5133 of 2014 against the aforementioned order. The order whereby FIR was quashed was set aside vide order dated 18.08.2017. The petitioner also undertook to come back to India surrender and seek regular bail as he was a proclaimed offender. 4. The instant second petition has been preferred without complying with the undertaking given before the Hon’ble Supreme Court. 5. I have heard counsel for the parties. 6. Apparently, the petitioner has not complied with the undertaking given before the Hon’ble Supreme Court as is evident from order dated 18.08.2017 in as much as he has not come back to India and surrendered before the Court and sought the concession of bail. To the contrary he has instead filed the second petition for quashing of the FIR and the order vide which he was declared proclaimed offender. 7. Therefore, I find no merit in the present petition and the same stands dismissed. ( JASJIT SINGH BEDI ) JUDGE August 28, 2025 Vinay Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No VINAY MAHAJAN 2025.08.29 15:31 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document