Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC:11549 RSA No. 874 of 2014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 874 OF 2014 (DEC/INJ) BETWEEN: N.RAMESH, S/O K NAGEGOWDA, AGED MAJOR, D NO.42 (13/1), 7TH CROSS 5TH MAIN, RAMAMANDIR ROAD, VINAYAKA NAGAR, MYSORE - 570 012, (AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS). …APPELLANT (BY SRI ARPITH R REDDY, ADVOCATE FOR SRI SUBBA REDDY K N, ADVOCATE) AND:
NANJAMMA - DELETED AS DEAD.
1.
SIDDA NAIKA, S/O LATE DODDASIDDAIAH, AGED ABOUT MAJOR,
2.
MINNAIAH @ RACHAPPA, S/O LATE DODDASIDDAIAH, AGED ABOUT MAJOR
3.
SIDDARAJU @ CHIKKA SIDDAIAH, S/O LATE DODDASIDDAIAH, AGED ABOUT MAJOR,
4. LAKSHMIDEVI, D/O LATE DODDASIDDAIAH, AGED ABOUT MAJOR, Digitally signed by PRAMILA G V Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC:11549 RSA No. 874 of 2014
5. SIDDAMMA, D/O LATE DODDASIDDAIAH, AGED ABOUT MAJOR,
6.
MARI NAIKA, AGED ABOUT MAJOR, ALL ARE RESIDING AT NO.2502, 3RD MAIN, 5TH CROSS, VINAYAKA NAGAR, MYSORE. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI P NATARAJU, ADVOCATE AND SRI SHIVANANDA R, ADV. FOR R1 & R4 TO R6, V/O DTD: 24.08.2023- APPEAL ABATED AGAINST R2 AND R3 ABATED)
THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT & DECREE DATED 29.03.2014 PASSED IN R.A.NO.137/2006 ON THE FILE OF THE IV ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, MYSORE, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGEMENT AND DECREE DATED23.11.2000 PASSED IN OS.NO.2524/1990 ON THE FILE OF THE III ADDITIONAL 1ST CIVIL JUDGE (JR.DN), MYSORE.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI ORAL JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for appellant seeks further time.
2. It is seen from order sheet that learned counsel for appellant had reported death of sole appellant six months prior to 24.11.2023. Same was noted by this Court. Since steps are
- 3 -
NC: 2025:KHC:11549 RSA No. 874 of 2014 not taken despite lapse of sufficient time, which would indicate that appeal is not diligently pursued by appellant.
Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (RAVI V HOSMANI) JUDGE GVP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 17