Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 22801 (ALL)

DINESH PANDEY v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

WRIC/6016/2025 · 2025-03-06

Shekhar B Saraf, Vipin Chandra Dixit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:33688-DB Court No. - 40 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 6016 of 2025 Petitioner :- Dinesh Pandey Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- M.Z. Hoda Counsel for Respondent :- Ashish Agrawal,C.S.C.,Om Prakash Gupta Hon'ble Shekhar B. Saraf,J. Hon'ble Vipin Chandra Dixit,J. 1. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner. 2. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India wherein the petitioner is seeking a direction upon the District Consumer Forum Commission to expedite the hearing of Case No.59 of 2023 (Dinesh Pandey v. Branch Manager, Union Bank of India, Sarai Pakwan & others) within a time framed by this Court. 3. Upon a perusal of the record, it appears that the hearing of the aforesaid suit has been delayed inordinately and the progress has been tardy. Accordingly, the District Consumer Forum Commission is directed to expedite the hearing of the aforesaid case and decide the same expeditiously, preferably within a period of six months from the date of production of a certified copy of this order. 4. It is made clear that the forum concerned will not grant any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties and if it is granted, the forum concerned should impose costs for the same. 5. With the aforesaid directions, the writ petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 7.3.2025 A.N. Mishra (Vipin Chandra Dixit,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Digitally signed by :- AMARNATH MISHRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad