Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 22798 (HP)

KARAN SHARMA AND ANOTHER v. THE STATE OF HP AND ANOTHER

CWP/13002/2025 · 2025-08-12

Jyotsna Rewal Dua

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.13002 of 2025 Decided on: 12.08.2025 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Karan Sharma and Anr …..Petitioners Versus State of H.P. and Anr .....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioners: Ms. Mamta Garg, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Rajat Chaudhary, Assistant Advocate General. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Notice. Mr. Rajat Chaudhary, learned Assistant Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the matter is heard at this stage. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have filed representations dated 29.07.2025 [Annexure P-4 (colly)] to respondent No.2 for the redressal of their grievances raised in this writ petition. Petitioners’ grievance is that the representations preferred by 1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes. 2 them for redressal of their grievances in light of settled legal position have not been adjudicated till date. Learned counsel further submits that the petitioners would be content in case respondent No.2/competent authority is directed to consider and decide the aforesaid representations in accordance with law within a fixed-time schedule. Learned Assistant Advocate General is not averse to this prayer. 4. Having regard to the afore-submissions, but without examining the merits of the matter, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2/ competent authority to consider and decide the aforesaid representations of the petitioners in accordance with law within a period of six weeks from today. The decision so arrived at shall also be communicated to the petitioners. The writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. Jyotsna Rewal Dua August 12, 2025 Judge R.Atal