Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 22797 (AP)

BHYRI GOVINDA RAO v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/16332/2025 · 2025-07-03

Harinath N

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 HN, J W.P.No.16332_2025 APHC010322152025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] FRIDAY,THE FOURTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 16332/2025 Between: 1. BHYRI GOVINDA RAO, S/O LATE BHYRI APPAYYA AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, OCC CULTIVATION R/O DOOR NO.2-202, BYRI VILLAGE, SRIKAKULAM RURAL AND MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATI. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, AMARAVATI. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT AT SRIKAKULAM. 4. SRI PYDIPU NAIDU, CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, I TOWN CIRCLE, SRIKAKULAM RURAL AND MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 5. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, SRIKAKULAM RURAL POLICE STATION SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 6. YENDU CHINNA RAO, S/O APPALA SATYANARAYANA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, OCC SERVICE, R/O BYRI VILLAGE, 2 HN, J W.P.No.16332_2025 SRIKAKULAM RURAL AND MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 7. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT AT SRIKAKULAM. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toPleased to issue a writ, order or a direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus to declare the action of the Respondents, more particularly respondents No.4 and 5 calling to Police Station and interfere with civil disputes and threatening to not to object to lay any road in and over petitioner property of land admeasuring Ac. 1.43 cents in Survey No.92/3 at Bhyri Village and Panchayat, Srikakulam Rural AND Mandal and interfering with possession and enjoyment without any acquisition or following due process of law as illegal and untenable, unsustainable, arbitrary and against the law as well as principles of natural justice, consequentially, direct the Respondents not to interfere with civil disputes without following due process of law and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the Respondents not to interfere with petitioner in respect of petitioner property of land admeasuring Ac. 1.43 cents in New Survey No.92/3 at Bhyri Village and Panchayat, Srikakulam Rural & Mandal including not to call to Police Station without following due process of law and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K B RAMANNA DORA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2. GP FOR REVENUE 3 HN, J W.P.No.16332_2025 The Court made the following Order: 1. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is being troubled by respondent No.5 at the behest of respondent No.6 and that they are interfering in the civil disputes pending between the petitioner and respondent No.6. 2. It is submitted that the petitioners are being pressurized to settle the same with respondent No.6. 3. Heard the learned Assistant Government Pleader. 4. Considering the submissions, there shall be a direction to the respondent Nos.4 and 5 not to disturb the peace of the petitioner without following due process of law. 5. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed off. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date: 04.07.2025 NKA 4 HN, J W.P.No.16332_2025 274 HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N Writ Petition No.16332 of 2025 Date: 04.07.2025 NKA