Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 22795 (PNJ)

THE HARYANA STATE FEDRATION OF CONSUMER COOPERATIVE WHOLESALE STORES LTD. v. PRESIDING OFFICER AND ANR.

CWP/14902/2000 · 2025-08-08

Harsimran Singh Sethi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (101) CM-10915-CWP-2025 in/and CWP-14902-2000 Date of Decision : August 08, 2025 The Haryana State Federation of Consumer Cooperative Wholesale Stores Ltd. .. Petitioner Versus The Presiding Officer, Labour Court-II, Faridabad and another .. Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI Present: Mr. Sanjeev Kaushik, Advocate, with Mr. Divyanshu Kaushik, Advocate and Mr. Abhinav Kaushik, Advocate, for the petitioner. None for respondent No.2. HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI J. (ORAL) CM-10915-CWP-2025 Present application has been filed for recalling the order dated 10.03.2025 passed by this Court, by which, the present writ petition was dismissed for non-prosecution. Keeping in view the averments made in the application, which are duly supported by an affidavit, the same is allowed. The order dated 10.03.2025 is recalled and the writ petition is restored to its original number and status and on the request of learned counsel for the applicant-petitioner, the main case is taken up for hearing today. CWP-14902-2000 1. Present writ petition was filed in the year 2000 challenging the Award dated 11.08.2000 (Annexure P-2). HARSHA RANI 2025.08.11 09:42 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CM-10915-CWP-2025 in/and 2 CWP-14902-2000 2. Respondent No.2, who is contesting respondent, has not been served even upto today. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that as there is no interim order, the Award dated 11.08.2000 (Annexure P-2) must have been complied with also. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that keeping in view the fact that respondent No.2 has not been served as of now, who is only the contesting respondent, the present writ petition may kindly be disposed of having been not pressed any further with liberty to the petitioner to revive the same in case anything survives in the present petition. 5. Ordered accordingly. August 08, 2025 (HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) harsha JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes Whether reportable : No HARSHA RANI 2025.08.11 09:42 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document