APHC010321702009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3369] WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 2107/2009 Between: 1. KAKARLA BALAJI GUPTA, S/O. LAKSHMIPATHY CHETTY, BUSINESS, R/O. THEERTHAM VILLAGE AND POST, BAIREDDIPALLI MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. STATE OF A P REP BY PP AND ANOTHER, REP BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF A.P., HYDERABAD. 2. R.BHAGYALAKSHMI BHANU, W/O. KAKARLA BALAJI GUPTA,D/O. R.SEKHAR, DEPARTMENT, R/O. D.NO. 6-10-138/E, 2ND FLOOR,T.K. STREET, TIRUPATI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. AT PRESENT R/O. D.NO. 7-6-229, METTA STREET, TIRUPATI ...RESPONDENT(S): Revision filed under Section 397/401 of Cr.P.C. praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the Criminal Revision Case, the High Court may be pleased toto present revision case is being filed against the orders, dated 20.10.2009, in M.C.No.17 of 2007, on the file of the Family Court- cum-V Additional District and Sessions Judge, Tirupati, Chittoor District IA NO: 1 OF 2009(CRLRCMP 2964 OF 2009 Petition under Section 151 C.P.C. praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the order, dated 20.10.2009, in M.C.No.17 of 2007, on the file of the Family Court-cum-V Additional District and Sessions Judge, Tirupati , Chittoor District Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K RAMAMOHAN Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. P HEMACHANDRA 2. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.MALLIKARJUNA RAO Criminal Revision Case No.2107 of 2009 ORDER: This Criminal Revision Case is filed against the orders dated 20.10.2009, passed in M.C.No.17 of 2007 on the file of the learned Family Court-cum-V Additional District and Sessions Judge, Tirupati, Chittoor District, granting maintenance amount to the respondents therein. 2. Learned counsel appearing on both sides are present. 3. As per the proceeding sheet dated 06.08.2025, learned counsel for the petitioner/appellant reported no instructions from the party. It seems that the revision petitioner/husband is not interested to proceed with the matter. 4. Since the revision petitioner is not showing interest, this Criminal Revision Case is dismissed for non prosecution. Interim orders granted earlier, if any, shall stand vacated. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ________________________ T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO, J Date: 20.08.2025 M K K