Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 22781 (KAR)

SMT. NAGAMMA v. VEERESH

WP/32146/2019 · 2025-01-07

Lalitha Kanneganti

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:311 WP No. 32146 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI WRIT PETITION NO. 32146 OF 2019 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: SMT. NAGAMMA, W/O NAGENDRAPPA VADAKAPPANAVAR, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, HOUSE HOLD, R/O KADENAHALLI, SHIKARIPURA TALUK - 577 427, SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SIDDAPPA B.M, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. VEERESH, S/O NAGENDRAPPA VADAKAPPANAVAR, AGRICULTURIST, R/O KADENAHALLI, SHIKARIPURA TALUK - 577 427, SHIVAMOGA DISTRICT. 2. KIRAN, S/O ESHWARAPPA VADAKAPPANAVAR, AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS, AGRICULTURIST, R/O KADENAHALLI, SHIKARIPURA TALUK - 577 427, SHIVAMOGA DISTRICT. Digitally signed by SUVARNA T Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:311 WP No. 32146 of 2019 3. ASHOK SHIVALINGAPPA MAGADI, S/O ESHWARAPPA VADAKAPPANAVAR, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS AGRICULTURIST, R/O KADENAHALLI, SHIKARIPURA TALUK - 577 427, SHIVAMOGA DISTRICT. 4. SHIVAYOGAPPA, S/O ESHWARAPPA VADAKAPPANAVAR, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARSM, TEACHER, R/O KADENAHALLI, SHIKARIPURA TALUK, AT PRESENT R/O SAGAR, SHIVAMOGA DISTRICT - 577 427. 5. RAMACHANDRAPPA, S/O BASAPPA MUTTAGI, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, AGRICULTURIST, R/O KADENAHALLI, SHIKARIPURA TALUK - 577 427, SHIVAMOGA DISTRICT. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SRIKANTH PATIL K, ADVOCATE FOR R1 TO R5) THIS W.P IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER PASSED BY THE LEARNED SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SHIKARIPURA IN MA NO.2/2019 DATED 23.2.2019 VIDE ANNEXURE-G AND ETC., - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:311 WP No. 32146 of 2019 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the suit itself is disposed of and this petition has become infructous. Considering the submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructous. All I.As. in the writ petition shall stand closed. SD/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE KA List No.: 1 Sl. No.: 44 CT: BHK