Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 22777 (CHH)

MRS. SARANYA RITESH v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/5812/2025 · 2025-07-08

Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:31745 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 5812 of 2025 1 - Mrs. Saranya Ritesh W/o Mr. C.B. Ritesh Aged About 38 Years Post Lecturer (Local Body), Posted At Govt. Higher Secondary School, Pachari, Block Tilda, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 2 - Mrs. Bhumisuta Choudhary W/o Mr. Ramkumar Choudhary Aged About 47 Years Post Lecturer (Local Body), Posted At Govt. Higher Secondary School, Pachari, Block Tilda, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 3 - Mrs. Veena Thakur W/o Mr. Mukund Singh Thakur Aged About 50 Years Post Lecturer (Local Body), Posted At Govt. Higher Secondary School, Kanki, Block Tilda, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 4 - Mrs. Hempushpa Ratre W/o Mr. Maniram Ratre Aged About 37 Years Post Lecturer (Local Body), Posted At Govt. Higher Secondary School, Kharprikala, Block Tilda, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 5 - Mrs. Poonam Ran Verma W/o Mr. Pawan Kumar Verma Aged About 40 Years Post Lecturer (Local Body), Posted At Govt. Higher Secondary School, Khaprikala, Block Tilda, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 6 - Mrs. Shareka Khan W/o Mr. Firoz Khan Aged About 39 Years Post Lecturer (Local Body), Posted At Govt. Higher Secondary School, Pachari, Block Tilda, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 7 - Mrs. Aradhana Bahuguna W/o Mr. Avijit Bahuguna Aged About 43 Years Post Lecturer (Local Body), Posted At Govt. Higher Secondary School, Pachari, Block Tilda, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 8 - Ashok Kumar Kosle S/o Mr. Sekhva Ram Kosle Aged About 52 Years Post Lecturer (Local Body), Posted At Govt. Higher Secondary School, Pachari, Block Tilda, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, School Education Department, Mahanadi Bhawan Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. VEDPRAKASH DEWANGAN Digitally signed by VEDPRAKASH DEWANGAN Date: 2025.07.10 18:08:34 +0530 2 2 - Secretary Panchayat And Rural Development Department Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 3 - Director Lok Shikshan, Chhattisgarh, Block C Indravati Bhavan, Atal Nagar, Raipur. 4 - District Education Officer District Raipur Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) (Cause title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Parag Kotecha, Advocate For Respondent(s)/State : Mr. Kanwaljeet Singh Saini, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal Order on Board 09/07/2025 1. By way of this petition, the petitioners have sought the following relief(s):- “(i) The Hon'ble Court may kindly be please to direct respondents to consider the case of petitioners for grant of I st Kramonnati Vetanman, from the date when petitioners have completed 10 years of service from the initial date of appointment and grant all consequential, arrears & other benefit to the petitioners flowing from the grant of 1 st Karamonnati. (ii) Any other relief which this Hon'ble Court deems fit-and proper under the facts and circumstances of the case may also be passed in favour of the petitioner and the cost of the petition may be awarded in favour of the petitioner.” 3 2. The claim of the petitioners is with regard to grant of Kramonnati Vetanman after completion of 10 years and 20 years of their service. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that with regard to award of Kramonnati Vetanman some circular has also been issued by the respondent-State. Apart from this, Division Bench of this Court in case of “Smt. Sona Sahu v. State of Chhattisgarh and others”, in W.A. No. 261 of 2023 has also consider the identical issue. Petitioners are also entitle for first Kramonnati Vetanman and second Kramonnati Vetanman. He further submits that at present this petition may be disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to make a representation to the respondents/competent authority in light of order passed by this Court in W.A. No. 261 of 2023 dated 28/02/2024. 3. Learned State counsel opposes the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioners. 4. Be that as it may, looking to the limited prayer made by learned counsel for petitioners, this petition at this stage is disposed of permitting the petitioners to make representation raising all grounds as raised in this writ petition to competent authority annexing all relevant documents and judgment of this Court passed in W.A. No. 261 of 2023. On such representation being made, it is expected that the respondents/competent authority shall consider the same in accordance with law considering the circular(s) issued in this regard, in light of judgment of this Court in W.A. No. 261 of 2023 within further period of 04 months from the date of receipt of such representation. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on merits 4 of this case, it is for the respondent authorities to consider the claim of petitioners on its own merits. 5. With the aforesaid observation(s) and direction(s), the instant petition is hereby disposed of. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge ved