PRASHANT SON OF UDAYVEER v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/8335/2025 · 2025-07-04
Pramil Kumar Mathur
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 22775 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 22775 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:24740] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8335/2025 Prashant Son Of Udayveer, Aged About 22 Years, Resident Of Village Dirse, Police Station Deeg, District Deeg, (Raj.) (At Present Confined In Central Jail, Sewar) ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Kapil Nagayach For Respondent(s) For Complainant(s) : : Mr. Naresh Kumar Gupta, PP Mr. Avtar Singh Rathore HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR
Order 04/07/2025
1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.0047/2025 registered at Police Station-Kotwali Bharatpur, District-Bharatpur for the offence under Section 309(6) of BNS.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Public Prosecutor as well as counsel for the complainant and perused the material available on record.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that compromise has been arrived at between the parties, which is apparent as per para-5 of the impugned order. He further submits that the co-accused-Manish @ Mona has already been enlarged on bail by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court on 26.06.2025. He again submits that there are no criminal case registered against
[2025:RJ-JP:24740] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-8335/2025] the present petitioner. The petitioner is behind the Bars since 11.05.2025 and charge-sheet has been filed. The trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody, hence the bail application of the petitioner may be allowed.
4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application.
5. On consideration of the rival submission and material available on record and deliberating all the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner.
6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioner-Prashant Son Of Udayveer shall be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court for his appearance before that Court on all the dates till conclusion of the trial.
(PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J sunita/332