Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 22774 (KAR)

SMT A.K. KRUTHIKA SHARATH v. SRI C.S NAVEEN

MFA/3727/2014 · 2025-07-01

Umesh M Adiga

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:23596 MFA No. 3727 of 2014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMESH M ADIGA MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 3727 OF 2014 (MV) BETWEEN: SMT. A.K. KRUTHIKA SHARATH, D/O A.P. KRISHNEGOWDA, W/O SHARATH, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, RESIDING AT ROYAL ARCADE APTS, OPP. TILAK PARK, VIJAYAPURA, CHIKMAGALUR - 577 101. …APPELLANT (BY SMT. KAVYA S, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. K.N. SUBBA REDDY, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SRI C.S NAVEEN S/O NARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, RESIDING AT AYYAPPA NAGAR, CHIKMAGALUR - 577 101. 2. SRI. WAJID S/O SRI. MADEEN SAB, AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, RESIDING AT NEAR WATER TANK, VIJAYAPURA, CHIKMAGALUR - 577 101, OWNER OF BIKE BEARING NO.KA18L 5527. Digitally signed by ANNAPURNA G Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:23596 MFA No. 3727 of 2014 3. M/S BAJAJ ALLIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED, 403 AND 404, 4TH FLOOR, CRTSTAL ARCADE BUILDING, BALMATTA ROAD, MANGALORE - 575 001, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGER, (POLICY NO.OG 08 1710-1802-00002253). …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. O MAHESH, ADVOCATE FOR R3; R1 - SERVED; VIDE ORDER DATED 22.06.2021, THE APPEAL AGAINST R2 IS DISMISSED) THIS MFA IS FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 10.02.2014 PASSED IN MVC NO.217/2008 ON THE FILE OF THE I ADDL. DISTRICT JUDGE AND MEMBER, MACT, CHIKMAGALUR PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMESH M ADIGA ORAL JUDGMENT Learned counsel for the appellant filed a memo of retirement stating that notice was sent to the appellant. In spite of service of notice, the appellant has not given any instruction to proceed with the matter. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:23596 MFA No. 3727 of 2014 2. Memo is placed on record. 3. Learned counsel for the appellant has produced a letter that was sent to the appellant's address. However, the letter was returned with an endorsement 'no such addressee is found in the said address'. Hence, it was returned to the sender and the same is placed on record. 4. There is no representation for the appellant. The matter is pending before this Court for the last 12 years. 5. Therefore, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (UMESH M ADIGA) JUDGE AMA List No.: 1 Sl No.: 2 CT: BHK