RAKESH KUMAR SAINI S/O SHRI GARARAM SAINI v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN
HC/219/2025 · 2025-06-30
Avneesh Jhingan, Bhuwan Goyal
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 22772 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 22772 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:23788-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Habeas Corpus Petition No. 219/2025 Rakesh Kumar Saini S/o Shri Gararam Saini, Aged About 23 Years, Resident Of Ward No.7, Dhani Dehrala Wali Dhani, Jaipur. ----Petitioner Versus
1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Home Secretary, Department Of Home, Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. The Additional Director, General Of Police, Anti Human Trafficking Unit, Jaipur.
3. The Superintendent Of Police, Kotputli (Rural) District Kotputali
4. The Station House Officer, Police Station Pragpura District Kotputali
5. Rajkumar Saini S/o Shri Madan Lal Saini, Resident Of Dhani Dholi Kothi Village Dantil Tehsil Pawta District Kotputali.
6. Kamlesh Devi W/o Rajkumar Saini, Resident Of Dhani Dholi Kothi Village Dantil Tehsil Pawta District Kotputali.
7. Santosh Saini @ Santu S/o Madan Lal Saini, Resident Of Dhani Dholi Kothi Village Dantil Tehsil Pawta District Kotputali. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Ms.Madhumita Das, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr.Sudesh
Saini,
Additional Government Advocate.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHUWAN GOYAL
Order 30/06/2025
1.
Learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing for some time is not pressing this petition with liberty to avail remedies in accordance with law.
2. The petition is disposed of as not pressed with liberty as prayed for.
[2025:RJ-JP:23788-DB] (2 of 2) [HC-219/2025]
3. There is no doubt in the eventuality of petitioner availing the remedies in accordance with law, the Forum shall consider the same expeditiously.
(BHUWAN GOYAL), J (AVNEESH JHINGAN), J Himanshu Soni/83