Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010320622017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI THURSDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI AND HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 4189 OF 2017 Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, is filed aggrieved by the orders dated 02.06.2017 passed in IA.No.1027 of 2017 in T.O.P.No. 581 of 2015 and the consequent amended order in T.O.P. No.581 of 2015 dated 06.01.2017 on the file of the Principal District Judge, Visakhapatnam. Between:
M/s. CHANDANA BROTHERS SHOPPING MALL, a partnership firm registered under the Indian Partnership Act, (presently Chandana Brothers Shopping Mall Pvt Ltd rep by its director) having its office at CME Mall, Door No.29-2-22 to 25, Prakasaraopet, Visakhapatnam, Rep. by its Managing Partner, Sri Mavuri Venkata Ramana, S/o. Late M.Satyanarayana, aged about 50 years, R/o.D.No.53-33-16, Behind Lie Quarters,K.R.M.Colony, Visakhapatnam. ...Petitioner/Respondent No.14 (Defendant No.14) AND
1. Dr. Ayalsomayajula Bhavani Sankara Shastry, S/o. Late Rama Lakshmi Narasimha Sarma, Hindu, aged about 54 years. Doctor by Profession, R/o. Door No.11-2-1, Flat No.803, I & J Block, Sea Shells Enclave, Waltair Uplands, Opp: Government Circuit House, Navy House Road, Siripuram, Visakhapatnam. Respondent/Petitioner/Respondent N6.1
M
2. Ayalasomayajula Kanaka Rama Sarma, S/o. Late Ramalakshmi Narasimha Sarma, aged about 77 years, Hindu, Business, R/6. Door No.7-7-22, Kondapallivari Veedhi, Anakapalli, Visakhapatnam District. 3. Ayalasomayajulu Srirama Murthy, S/o. Late Ramalakshmi Narasimha Sarma, aged about 54 years, Hindu, Business, R/o. Door No.7-8-24, Kondapallivari Veedhi, Anakapalli, Visakhapatnam District. 4. Ayalasomayajula Rama Ganapathi Shastry, S/o. Late Rama Lakshmi ; Narasimha Sarma, aged about 49 years, Hindu, Business, R/o. Door No.7-8-24, Kondapallivari Veedhi, Anakapalli, Visakhapatnam Distrit L
5. Smt Mokarala Varalakshmi, W/o. Sridhar, aged about 56 years, Windu, Housewife, R/o. Door No.1-5-63, Gandhinagaram, First Street, Anakapalli, Visakhapatnam District. I
6. Maruvada Sesha Subrahmanyam, S/o. Late Sreeramachandra Murthy, aged about 50 years, Hindu, R/o. Door No. 1-5-62, Gandhinagaram, First Street, Anakapalli, Visakhapatnam District. 7. Maruvada Kameswara Rao, S/o. Late Sreeramachandra Murthy, aged about 44 years, Hindu, R/o. Door No.1-5-62, Gandhinagaram, First Street, Anakapalli, Visakhapatnam District. 8. Maruvada Rama Lakshmi Narasimha Sarma, S/o. Late Sreeramchandra Murthy, aged about 40 years, Hindu, R/o. Door No.1- 5-62, Gandhinagaram, First Street, Anakapalli, Visakhapatnam District; ...Respondents/ Petitioners 1 to 7/Defehdants 1 to 3, 5,10,12 & 13
9. Smt Nemani Parvathavardhanamma, W/o. Seshagiri Rao, aged about i 62 years, Hindu, Housewife, R/o. Door No.1-5-63, Gandhinagaram, First Street, Anakapalli, Visakhapatnam District.
10.Ayalasomayajula Usha, W/o. Rama Ganapathi Shastry, aged about 37 years, Hindu, Housewife, R/o. Door No.7-8-24, Kondapallivari Veedhi, Anakapalli, Visakhapatnam. 11. Nemani Venkata Subba Rao, S/o. Seshagiri Rao, Hindu, aged about 39 years. Employee, Door No.33~5-222, Shikarapara, Post Office Gully, Bilaspur, Chattisgarh. 12.Nemani Jwala (Lakshmi) Narasimha Murthy, S/o. Seshagiri Rao, Hindu, aged about 38 years, Employee, R/o. Door No.33-5-222, Shikarapara, Post Office Gully, Bilaspur, Chattisgarh. 13. Neman! Seshagiri Rao, S/o. Late Jwala Narasimham, aged about 70 years, R/o. Door No.33-5-222, Tikarapara, Gully Bilaspur, Chattisgarh. 14.Maruvada Sreenivasa Sastry, S/o. Late Sreeramachandra Murthy, aged about 47 years, Hindu, R/o. Door No.1-5-62, Gandhinagaram, First Street, Anakapalli, Visakhapatnam. Respondents/Respondents (Defendants 4,6,7,8,9,11) [R.R.9 to 14 herein are not necessary parties to this petition] lA NO: 1 OF 2017 (CRPMP 5508 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of order dated 02.06.2017 in LA No.1027 of 2017 in TCP No.581 of 2015 including all further proceedings pending disposal of the, C.R.P.
lA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to extend the interim order dated 24.08.2017 passed in CRP.No. 4189 of 2017 until further orders pending disposal of the CRP filing which the petitioners will suffer serious loss damage.
Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri P. Rajasekhar, Advocate Counsel for Respondent No.1: Sri Milind G Gokhale, Advocate GounselforRespondentNos.2to14:-- The Court made the following:
I APHC010320622017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATi (Special Original Jurisdiction) [35241 I I;
THURSDAY ,THE NINETEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 4189/2017 <1' Between: Chandana Brothers Shopping Mall .PETITIONER AND Dr Ayalsomayajula Bhavani Sankara Shastry 13 Others ...RESPONDENT(S) and Others Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.P RAJASEKHAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.MILINDGGOKHALE The Court made the following: i i i ’a w%mm i V ,r ■j- ' m Mm Vi i ■ V-‘ ; r. ‘•i-: y ' ■■ a; 'VV V a .a ■ .i' -Vy:' j; . •: o f o if 'O'-y a y.- y: 'Vf '-'av-: ; • a; ■■■ '■■of -'v -ya;; faaii' MMp- a ■; i / V ; ,_ya" ; ; ;.'"c 0- ' -a V' iv,> ; a.' :■ ■ -a#f •vj ^ ' ■a:y:aa.|;iay I r' V'. ■0 a -v-iiVV Vv;- •la' .o' ' o ■} a,-aal . .ii: ■ va-rr- •; i r'L ,y- - a. . :: '■'Mm Am i ■ a- 0- .-a. i . .y,. ■o 'X. ;a.'f a'aa.yVaVayaaa-yy:;a.a:s YlagoaxaVax,,, -v; - 'I i;; 'y,. /; -a^:- . •
-•-Ji THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CIVIL REVISION petition NO: 4189/2017 V
ORDER: (per Ravi Nath Tilhari, J) Heard Sri P.Rajasekhar, learned counsel for the petitioner. The petitioner in this Civil Revision Petition has challenged the order dated 06.01.2017 passed in TOP.No.581 of 2015 by the Principal District Judge, Visakhapatnam by which the suit was transferred and the said order was later on corrected by an order dated 02.06.2017.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has instructions from the petitioner that he does not want to press the present Civil Revision Petition as the petitioner intends to pursue the matter before the Court where it has been transferred. He further submits that the matter may be dismissed withdrawn.
3. as
4. Recording the aforesaid submission, the Civil Revision Petition is dism-'ssed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall also stand closed.
Sd/- B CHITTI JOSEPH ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To,
1. One CC to Sri P Rajasekhar, Advocate [OPUC]
2. One CC to Sri Milind G Gokhale, Advocate [OPUC]
3. Three CD Copies GPC (gsg)
HIGH COURT DATED:19/06/2025
ORDER CRP 4189/2017 sT 2 3 JUL 2025 i Co ■^^mjarontSectigfix ★X DISMISSING THIS CIVIL REVISION PETITION