APHC010320722012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] THURSDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 39506/2012 Between: 1. NALLI SARATH, S/O LATE BUSHANAM, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, NOW PRESENTLY WORKING AS HEAD MAZDOOR IN THE 0/O EXECUTIVE ENGINEER ANDHRA PRADESH EDUCATIONAL & WELFARE INFRASTRUCTURE, DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, NFCL ROAD, SIDDARTHA NAGAR, KAKINADA, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD. 2. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, ANDHRA PRADESH EDUCATIONAL AND INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, 4TH FLOOR, RVM(SSA) BUILIDNG, SCERT COMPOUND, L.B. STADIUM, OPP. 'E' GATE, NAMPALLY, HYDERABAD. 3. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, ANDHRA PRADESH EDUCATIONAL & WELFARE INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, NFCL ROAD, SIDDARTHA NAGAR, KAKINADA, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the respondents 2 2 & 3 in not regularizing the services of the petitioner as Attender from 5 years after initial appointment from 3-7-1986 with all consequential benefits as illegal, arbitrary and consequentially direct the Respondents to regularize the services of the petitioner as Attender in the Respondents 2 & 3 organization with all consequential benefits IA NO: 1 OF 2012(WPMP 50174 OF 2012 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent No.2 & 3 herein to regularize the services of the petitioner as Attender in the 2nd and 3rd Respondent organization with all consequential benefits, pending disposal of the above writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. B CHANDRA SHEKHAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. G V S KISHORE KUMAR 2. GP FOR COOPERATION The Court made the following order: Sri D.Subba Rao, learned counsel representing Sri B.Chandra Shekhar, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that by efflux of time, the cause in the writ petition does not survive and hence, the same is now rendered infructuous. 2. Recording the above submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel, all the pending miscellaneous petitions shall stand closed. ______________________ SUBBA REDDY SATTI, J Dated: 11.09.2024 SNI 3 118 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION No.39506 of 2012 Dated: 11.09.2024 SNI