Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Manipur · body

2025 DAILYLAW 2277 (MAN)

Leimapokpam Dayananda Singh v. State of Manipur and 7 Ors

MC(WP(C))/789/2025 · 2025-10-30

A Guneshwar Sharma

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Item No. 1-3 IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR AT IMPHAL WP(C) No. 850 of 2025 with MC(WP(C) No. 789 of 2025 with MC(WP(C) No. 774 of 2025 Leimapokpam Dayananda Singh …..Petitioner/s - Versus – State of Manipur & 5 Ors. .... Respondent/s BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A. GUNESHWAR SHARMA Order 31.10.2025 [1] M(WP(C) No. 789 of 2025: Heard Ms. W. Geetarani, learned counsel for the petitioner. [2] By the present application, the petitioner proposed to implead Hero Finance Corporation Ltd., New Delhi through its Branch Manager, Hero Fin Corp. Ltd., Chingmeirong, Imphal East, Manipur as respondent No. 7 and the Branch Manager, ICICI Lombard, Konjeng Hajari, Airport Road, Opposite Likla Bakery, Sagolband, Imphal Manipur as respondent No. 8. [3] It is submitted that in WP(C) No. 850 of 2025, due to inadvertence, they could not be impleaded as party in the writ petition. However, Hero Fin Corp. Ld. and ICICI Lombard are necessary parties in deciding the issue raised in the connected writ petition. [4] This Court has perused the materials on record and it is apparent that the rejection of the claim of the petitioner is at the instance of Hero Fin Corp. Ltd. and ICICI Lombard. Accordingly, Hero Fin Corp. Ltd and ICICI Lombard, Imphal Branch are impleaded as respondent Nos. 7 & 8 in WP(C) No. 850 of 2025. [5] MC(WP(C) No. 789 of 2025 is disposed of. [6] Petitioner is permitted to file amended memo of parties and incorporate in the writ petition. [7] List the remaining cases on 05.11.2025 in the motion column. JUDGE Kh. Joshua Maring KH. JOSHUA MARING Digitally signed by KH. JOSHUA MARING Date: 2025.11.03 09:40:10 +05'30'