MD NOOR ISLAM ALIAS NUR ISLAM v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
Cr.A(DB)/960/2025 · 2025-09-23
Pradeep Kumar Srivastava, Rongon Mukhopadhyay
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 22769 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 22769 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. ( 2025:JHHC:29417-DB )
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cr. Appeal (DB) No. 960 of 2025
Md. Noor Islam @ Nur Islam, son of Md. Khalil Sk, resident of village:
Mansigha, PO and PS: Rajmahal, District: Sahibganj... Appellant
Versus The State of Jharkhand
… Respondent
--- CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
For the Appellant : Mr. Raja Ravi Shekhar Singh, Advocate For the State
: Mr. Rajneesh Vardhan, A.P.P.
--- 03/23.09.2025
The objection filed by Mr. Rajneesh Vardhan, learned A.P.P. at the Bar is kept on record. Heard Mr. Raja Ravi Shekhar Singh, the learned counsel for the appellant and Mr. Rajneesh Vardhan, the learned A.P.P.
This appeal is directed against the order dated 17.07.2025 passed in B.P. No. 497 of 2025 arising out of Dhanbad GRPS Case No. 28 of 2025 by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-IV, Dhanbad, whereby and whereunder, the prayer for bail of the appellant has been rejected. It has been alleged that 14 persons were apprehended while they were boarding a train and the appellant, who was said to be the head of the persons who were apprehended, had disclosed that they were being taken to Tamil Nadu for working in JSS Company where he also works as a labourer. Submission has been advanced by the learned counsel for the appellant that 14 persons were being taken to Tamil Nadu for the purposes of working and in fact the appellant was also a clerk in the very same Company. The learned counsel submits that the appellant is in custody since 26.04.2025 and out of 14 persons 09 were found to be major whereas 05 persons were found to be minors. Learned A.P.P. has opposed the prayer for bail of the appellant and has submitted that the appellant is involved in human trafficking. He however admits that the appellant does not have any criminal antecedent. On consideration of the fact that all the children were recovered and the role played by the appellant of getting the said persons as a labourer in the Company in which he was working, we while setting aside the order dated 17.07.2025 passed in B.P. No. 497 of 2025 arising out of Dhanbad GRPS Case No. 28 of 2025 by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-IV, Dhanbad direct the appellant be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.
10,000/- (Rs. Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Railway Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Dhanbad in connection with Dhanbad GRPS Case No. 28 of 2025. This appeal is allowed. (RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY, J.)
(PRADEEP KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J.) Dated: 23.09.2025 S.B.
-2-