Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 22765 (JHR)

RAMESH MUNDA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

Cr.A(DB)/1001/2025 · 2025-09-09

Pradeep Kumar Srivastava, Rongon Mukhopadhyay

Civil Appealbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:27264-DB IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Appeal (DB) No. 1001 of 2025 Ramesh Munda --- --- Appellant Versus The State of Jharkhand --- --- Respondent --- CORAM: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay Hon’ble Mr. Justice Pradeep Kumar Srivastava --- For the appellant : Mr. P.K. Sahay, Adv. For the State : Mr. Anup Pawan Topno, A.P.P --- 02/09.09.2025 Earlier the appellant had moved for grant of bail in Cr. Appeal (DB) No.695 of 2024 which however was dismissed as not pressed vide order dated 10.02.2025 on the submission made by learned counsel for the appellant that since the charge has not been framed, therefore he is not pressing the said appeal. Subsequently according to the learned counsel for the appellant, charge has been framed. Heard Mr. P.K. Sahay, learned counsel for the appellant and learned A.P.P. This appeal is directed against the order dated 04.07.2025 passed in M.C.A. No. 1223 of 2025 in connection with Sadar P.S. Case No. 74 of 2024 by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-III, Chatra, whereby and whereunder the prayer for bail of the appellant has been rejected. It has been alleged that there was an encounter between the extremists and Police personnel as a result of which two Police personnel had died and one had suffered injury. Submission has been advanced by the learned counsel for the appellant that the appellant is not named in the First Information Report but has subsequently been implicated only on the basis of suspicion. It has further been submitted that though the appellant has got criminal antecedents but in some of the cases either he has been acquitted or has been granted bail. Learned counsel adds that the appellant is in custody since 26.02.2024 and some of the co-accused have been granted bail by a Coordinate Bench of this Court in Cr. Appeal (DB) No.1054 of 2024 and Cr. Appeal (DB) No.1464 of 2024. Learned A.P.P. has opposed the prayer for bail of the appellant. 2 Regard being had to the manner of implication of the appellant and the fact that some of the co-accused persons have been granted bail by a Coordinate Bench of this Court, as noted above, we while setting aside the order dated 04.07.2025 passed in M.C.A. No. 1223 of 2025 in connection with Sadar P.S. Case No. 74 of 2024 by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-III, Chatra, direct the appellant to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-III, Chatra in connection with Sadar P.S. Case No.74 of 2024. This appeal stands allowed and disposed of. (Rongon Mukhopadhyay, J.) (Pradeep Kumar Srivastava, J.) Shamim/