Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 22764 (GAU)

The Union of India represented by the Secretary to the Government of India and Anr. v. Smt. Saithangpuii Sailo and 5 Ors.

I.A.(Civil)/45/2025 · 2025-03-17

Yarenjungla Longkumer

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/6 GAHC030007122023 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : RFA/53/2023 Union of India and Anr. R/b The Secretary to the Govt. of India, Ministry of Defence, South Block, New Delhi - 110011 2: The Chief Engineer Project Pushpak BRO Thuampui Aizawl Mizoram C/o 99AP VERSUS Smt. Saithangpuii Sailo and 5 Ors. D/o Biakthuama (L) R/o Tuikual North, Aizawl 2:Sh. Thanzauva (L) S/o Liantudaia (L) R/o Saitual Aizawl Mizoram S/b Smt. Lalkhumtiri W/o Sh. Thanzauva (L) 3:The State of Mizoram r/b The Secretary to the Govt. of Mizoram Land Revenue and Settlement Department Aizawl 4:The Director Land Revenue and Settlement Department Govt. of Mizoram Aizawl 5:Sh. D. Lalrintluanga S/o Lalrinchhana R/o Bethlehem Page No.# 2/6 Aizawl 6:Sh. Bialzauva (L) r/b his wife and Legal Representative Smt. Lalzamliani Sailo R/o Electric Ven Advocate for the Petitioner : Ms Zairemsangpuii, CGC Advocate for the Respondent : Mr C Lalramzauva Sr. Adv. for R1 Linked Case : I.A.(Civil)/165/2023 The Union of India represented by The Secretary to the Govt. of India Ministry of Defence and Anr South Block New Delhi 110011 2: The Chief Engineer Project Pushpak BRO Thuampui Aizawl Mizoram C/o 99APO VERSUS Smt. Saithangpuii and 5 Ors. D/o Biakthuama (L) R/o Tuikual North Aizawl 2:Sh. Thanzauva S/o Liantudaia (L) R/o Saitual Aizawl Mizoram 3:The State of Mizoram r/b The Secretary to the Govt. of Mizoram Land Revenue and Settlement Department Aizawl 4:The Director Page No.# 3/6 Land Revenue and Settlement Department Govt. of Mizoram Aizawl 5:Sh. D. Lalrintluanga S/o Lalrinchhana R/o Bethlehem Aizawl 6:Sh. Bialzauva (L) r/b his wife and Legal representative Smt. Lalzamliani Sailo R/o Electric Veng Advocate for the Petitioner : Ms Zairemsangpuii CGC Advocate for the Respondent : Mr C Lalramzauva Sr. Adv. for R1 Linked Case : I.A.(Civil)/45/2025 The Union of India represented by the Secretary to the Government of India and Anr. Ministry of Defence South Block New Delhi-110011 2: The Chief Engineer Project Pushpak BRO Aizawl Mizoram C/o 99 APO VERSUS Smt. Saithangpuii Sailo and 5 Ors. D/o Biakthuama (L) R/o Tuikual North Aizawl 2:Sh. Thanzauva S/o Liantudaia (L) R/o Saitual Aizawl Mizoram 3:The State of Mizoram represented by the Secretary to the Govt. of Mizoram Land Revenue and Settlement Department Aizawl Page No.# 4/6 4:The Director Land Revenue and Settlement Department Govt. of Mizoram Aizawl 5:Sh. D. Lalrintluanga S/o Lalrinchhana R/o Bethlehem Aizawl 6:Sh. Bialzauva (L) represented by his wife and Legal representative Smt. Lalzamliani Sailo R/o Electric Veng Advocate for the Petitioner : Ms Zairemsangpuii CGC Advocate for the Respondent : Mr C Lalramzauva Sr. Adv. for R1 Linked Case : I.A.(Civil)/46/2025 The Union of India represented by the Secretary to the Government of India and Anr. Ministry of Defence South Block New Delhi-110011 2: The Chief Engineer Project Pushpak BRO Aizawl Mizoram C/o 99 APO VERSUS Smt. Saithangpuii Sailo and 5 Ors. D/o Biakthuama (L) R/o Tuikual North Aizawl 2:Sh. Thanzauva S/o Liantudaia (L) R/o Saitual Aizawl Mizoram 3:The State of Mizoram represented by the Secretary to the Govt. of Mizoram Page No.# 5/6 Land Revenue and Settlement Department Aizawl 4:The Director Land Revenue and Settlement Department Govt. of Mizoram Aizawl 5:Sh. D. Lalrintluanga S/o Lalrinchhana R/o Bethlehem Aizawl 6:Sh. Bialzauva (L) represented by his wife and Legal representative Smt. Lalzamliani Sailo R/o Electric Veng Advocate for the Petitioner : Ms Zairemsangpuii CGC Advocate for the Respondent : Mr C Lalramzauva Sr. Adv. for R1 B E F O R E HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MARLI VANKUNG ORDER 24.04.2025 Ms. Baby Laldinzuali, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Ms. Zairemsangpuii, learned CGC has prayed for adjournment of the matter, which is not objected by the learned counsel for the respondents. In view of the above, list the matter after 2 (two) weeks. JUDGE Page No.# 6/6 Comparing Assistant