Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 22760 (ALL)

RAVINDRA KUMAR SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

WRIC/6151/2025 · 2025-03-02

Ashwani Kumar Mishra, Donadi Ramesh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:29292-DB Court No. - 29 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 6151 of 2025 Petitioner :- Ravindra Kumar Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Dharmendra Kumar Nirankari,Ranjeet Sonker Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Ashwani Kumar Mishra,J. Hon'ble Donadi Ramesh,J. Petitioner's grievance is that the Sub Divisional Officer, who is the prescribed authority under the U.P. Bharan Poshan Evam Kalyan Adhiniyam, 2007, is not issuing certified copy of the orders and that the file itself is otherwise missing. Learned State Counsel submits that such issue can be examined by the second respondent. In the facts of the case, we permit the petitioner to approach the second-respondent in respect of the grievance raised in the writ petition. The second respondent shall ensure that the petitioner's grievance is redressed, in accordance with law. In the event, file is reported to be missing, appropriate steps would be taken for reconstruction of file, unless the provision exists, otherwise. Necessary action in the matter would be taken, within a period of four weeks from date of presentation of copy of this order before the second respondent. It will be open for the authority also to examine as to whether any order exists on the original record of which certified copy is being sought. With the above observations, the writ petition stands disposed of. Order Date :- 3.3.2025 Noman Digitally signed by :- NOMAN AHMAD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad