[2025:RJ-JP:30062] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8223/2025 Jeetu S/o Narpatram, Aged About 21 Years, Resident Of Dhani Hongad Tan Dharvi, Police Station Shiv, District Barmer, Presently Residing At Link Road Junior Chauraha Barmer Bypass, Police Station Kotwali District Jaisalmer (Presently Accused Confined In Central Jail At Jaipur) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajender Singh Tanwar Mr. Sita Ram Meena For Respondent(s) : Ms. Manju Dave, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 05/08/2025 1 This instant application for bail filed under Section 483 of BNSS by the applicant-accused Jeetu S/o Narpatram in FIR No. 09/2025 dated 18.01.2025 registered at P.S. Aandhi, District – Jaipur Rural whereby the applicant-accused has charged under Sections 137(2), 96, 70(2) BNS, Section 16/17 POCSO Act, Section 84 of JJ Act and 3(2)(v) of SC/ST (POA) Act. 2 The applicant- Jeetu S/o Narpatram was arrested on 18.06.2025 and has in judicial custody since then. The Court below has dismissed the bail application. [2025:RJ-JP:30062] (2 of 4) [CRLMB-8223/2025] 3 Learned counsel for the applicant relying upon grounds raised in bail application submits that the applicant is innocent and falsely implicated in the present case. He also submitted that the allegation on present appellant is to provide assistance in elopement of main accused Ravi who was already granted bail by learned Special Judge, SC/ST (POA) Act Cases on 05.02.2025. He further submitted that the investigation relating to present applicant-accused is complete and is no more required by the Investigating Agency for investigation. He further assures that in case, the applicant-accused is required for further investigation, the applicant-accused will be available for such investigation. He also submitted that the investigation will take its own time and no purpose will be served by keeping the applicant- accused in custody. 4 Aforesaid contentions were opposed by learned Public Prosecutor. She submitted that the complainant is already informed about the instant bail application. She also placed on record the report received from concerned Police Station. 5 Heard learned counsel for the applicant-accused and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material placed on record by both the parties. 6 During investigation, the victim was recovered and her statement under Section 164 Cr.P.C. was recorded on 21.02.2025 and the main allegation is upon Ravi. Initially, when the case was heard by learned Special Judge SC/ST (POA) Act Cases, Jaipur District, Jaipur (Additional Sessions Judge No.2) Jaipur District, Jaipur then on 05.02.2025 [2025:RJ-JP:30062] (3 of 4) [CRLMB-8223/2025] accused Ravi Kumar was granted bail under Section 483 of BNSS. 7 Upon hearing the arguments and perusing the record, we have found that the applicant-accused is no more required in the investigation and he is in custody for quite some time. The further proceedings will take its own time, therefore, looking to entirety of facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, the Court deems it appropriate to grant bail to the applicant- accused Jeetu S/o Narpatram. 8 Thus, the instant bail application filed on behalf of applicant- accused Jeetu S/o Narpatram, is hereby allowed and the applicant-accused Jeetu S/o Narpatram Ram is ordered to be released on bail upon furnishing a personal bond of ₹50,000/- with two sureties of like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court with the following conditions:- (i) The applicant-accused shall not tamper with evidence or influence the witness in any manner. (ii) That the appellant accused shall not contact or connect directly or indirectly with victim or any of her family member. (iii) The applicant-accused shall not indulge in any criminal activity and shall not repeat any criminal offence punishable under the Law. (iv) The applicant-accused shall attend the hearing of the Trial Court on the date fixed by the Trial court or as and when asked to appear before the Trial Court. [2025:RJ-JP:30062] (4 of 4) [CRLMB-8223/2025] (v) In case of any violation of above conditions, the bail granted to the applicant-accused shall be liable to be cancelled. 9. The Registry is directed to send a copy of this order to the Trial Court through E-mail. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J MONU /163