[2025:RJ-JP:30409] ssHIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8145/2025 Yogendra Son Of Ramniwas, Resident Of Bhikha Ka Pura Mauroli Police Station Kotwali Dholpur ( Raj.) ( At Present Confined In District Jail Dholpur) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. C.M. Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.S. Dhakar, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 07/08/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.190/2025 registered at Police Station Saipau, District Dholpur (Rajasthan) for the offences punishable under Sections 281, 121(1), 132, 109(1) & 303(2) of BNS, Section 29 & 51 of Wildlife Protection Act, 1972 and Section 41 & 42 of Rajasthan Forest Act, 1953. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Counsel submits that other similar situated co-accused namely Bhanu Singh and Rahul have been granted benefit of bail by learned trial Court but bail of the petitioner has been denied solely on the fact that one another case is pending against him of similar nature. It is submitted that trial will take considerable time in its conclusion. Petitioner is in [2025:RJ-JP:30409] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-8145/2025] custody since 17.06.2025 and further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose. 3. Learned Special Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by counsel for the petitioner. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner, as also the fact that other similar situated co-accused namely Bhanu Singh and Rahul have been granted benefit of bail by learned trial Court as well as looking to the period of custody, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it fit and proper to allow this bail application. 6. The bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner- Yogendra Son Of Ramniwas shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. It is made clear that the accused-petitioner shall not involve in any other offence(s) during currency of the bail and he shall mark his presence in first week of every three month in the concerned police station. [2025:RJ-JP:30409] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-8145/2025] 8. Concerned SHO is directed to maintain a register recording the attendance of the petitioner. In case the petitioner fails to mark his presence in the concerned police station, the concerned SHO is directed to immediately report the matter to the concerned Court in this regard. 9. If any breach of these conditions is reported or come to the notice of the Court, the same shall alone be a reason for the trial court to cancel the bail granted to him by this Court. 10. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned SHO for necessary compliance. 11. The observations made hereinabove are only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J LALIT MOHAN /173