PANKAJ ALIAS BITTU S/O DAYANAND v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/8245/2025 · 2025-08-04
Ashok Kumar Jain
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 22753 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 22753 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:29849] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8245/2025 Pankaj Alias Bittu S/o Dayanand, Aged About 30 Years, Resident Of Sonasar Police Station Dhanuri Jhunjhunu, District Jhunjhunu (Raj.) ( Presently Confined In Central Jail Jhunjhunu) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Amit Malani For Respondent(s) : Mr. Devi Singh, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN
Order 04/08/2025
1. This instant application for bail filed under Section 483 of BNSS by the applicant-accused Pankaj Alias Bittu S/o Dayanand in FIR No. 34/2025 dated 16.03.2025 registered at Police Station Dhanuri, District Jhunjhunu, whereby the applicant-accused has charged under Sections 115(2), 331(6), 351(2) and 352 of BNS.
2.
Learned counsel for the applicant relying upon grounds raised in bail application submits that the applicant is an innocent person and falsely implicated in the present case. Further he submitted that the investigation relating to present applicant is complete and is no more required by the Investigating Agency for investigation. He further assures that in case, the applicant is required for further investigation, the applicant will be available for such investigation. He also submitted that the trial will take its
[2025:RJ-JP:29849] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-8245/2025] own time and no purpose will be served by keeping the applicant in custody.
3.
Learned counsel for the applicant submits that due to animosity between the neighbours the instant case was registered by complainant. He further submitted that except simple injury no injury was alleged by complainant. He also submitted that co- accused was already granted bail by this Hon’ble Court and case of present applicant is identical in nature.
4. Aforesaid contentions were opposed by learned Public Prosecutor.
5. Heard learned counsel for applicant and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material placed on record by both the parties.
6. After registration of FIR on 16.03.2025, police has investigated the matter and found that there were regular incidents between the parties. Other accused was granted basil by this Court on 11.06.2025. As per report, 2 more cases were registered against applicant-accused, but considering totality of
facts and circumstances of the case, it is appropriate to allow the bail application of this applicant.
7. Thus, the instant bail application filed on behalf of applicant- accused Pankaj Alias Bittu S/o Dayanand is hereby allowed and the applicant, is ordered to be released on bail upon furnishing a personal bond of ₹50,000/- with two sureties of like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court with the following conditions:- (i) The applicant-accused shall not tamper with evidence or influence the witness in any manner.
[2025:RJ-JP:29849] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-8245/2025] (ii) The applicant-accused shall not indulge in any criminal activity and shall not repeat any criminal offence punishable under the Law. (iii) The applicant-accused shall attend the hearing of the Trial Court on the date fixed by the Trial Court or as and when asked to appear before the Trial Court. (iv) In case of any violated of above conditions, the bail granted to applicant-accused shall be liable to be cancelled.
8. The Registry is directed to send a copy of this order to the Trial Court through E-mail.
(ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J GAURAV /14-S