Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 2275 (AP)

MEKA VENKATARAMI REDDY v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

CRLP/11/2025 · 2025-01-17

Maheswara Rao Kuncheam

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CRIMINAL PETITION No.11 of 2025 ORDER: The instant criminal petition is filed under Section 483 (1) (b) of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhitha (BNSS) on behalf of the petitioner/A1, seeking to relax the condition imposed vide order dated 26.11.2024 in Crl.M.P No.2973 of 2024 on the file of Prl. Civil Judge (Junior Division), Kovur, (FAC), Addl. Civil Judge (Junior Division), Kavali, in connection with Crime No.162 of 2024 of Kavali I Town, Police Station. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Public Prosecutor. 3. Perused the material available on record. 4. The petitioner is an accused in Crime No.162 of 2024 of Kavali I Town, Police Station, registered for offenses punishable under Section 196(1), 352, 353(2) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Act. 5. The petitioner/accused is granted bail by an order dated 06.12.2024 in Crl.M.P No.2973 of 2024 on the file of Prl. Civil Judge (Junior Division), Kovur, (FAC), Addl. Civil Judge (Junior Division), Kavali., on the condition of executing personal bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties and he was directed to attend SHO, Kavali I Town, Police 2 Station on every Wednesday between 2.00p.m to 5.00p.m for two (02) months or until filing of the charge sheet whichever is earlier. 6. It is contended by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is aged about 49 years and he is eking out his livelihood, primarily by doing small-scale agriculture business to support his family. It is further contended that in view of the conditions imposed by various Hon’ble Courts in connection with multiple cases, the petitioner is forced to go to the respective Police Stations in and around Andhra Pradesh continuously round the clock, which directly affects his right to life. Hence, the criminal petition. 7. Having regard to the above facts and circumstances, it is apparent that the petitioner is involved in several cases in similar type of offenses, in order to comply with the respective Hon’ble Courts’ directions, is bound to go around the clock in a week to the different jurisdictional Police Stations, which naturally affects his right to life. As the right to life is one of the indispensable fundamental right as enunciated in Article 21 of the Constitution of India. Hence, this Court by adopting pragmatic and purposive import, that “excessive bail is no bail” and also in view of the Law laid down by the Apex Court in Policy Strategy for Grant of Bail, in RE1and Girish Gandhi Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh2, is inclined to modify the condition to the extent that the petitioner shall attend Kavali I 1 (2024) 10 SCC 685 2 (2024) 10 SCC 674 3 Town, Police Station once in a month i.e., on 1st Wednesday between 2.00pm and 5.00pm, till the filing of the Charge Sheet. The rest of the conditions shall remain unaltered. Accordingly, the criminal petition is disposed of. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. ______________________________ MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM, J Date:17.01.2025 GVK 4 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CRIMINAL PETITION No.11 OF 2025 Date: 17.01.2025 GVK