[2025:RJ-JP:34827] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8192/2025 Sajid Khan S/o Jumruddin, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Pratap Bas, Kotakhurd, Police Station Ramgarh District Alwar Rajasthan ( Petitioner Is In Judicial Custody In District Jail Alwar) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Manish Gupta For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 22/08/2025 1. This instant application for bail filed under Section 483 of BNSS by the applicant-accused Sajid Khan S/o Jumruddin in FIR No. 198/2025 dated 21.05.2025 registered at P.S. Ramgarh District -Alwar, whereby the applicant-accused was charged under Sections 318(4), 319(2), 336(2) of BNS read with Section 66-D of IT Act. 2. The applicant was arrested and is in judicial custody since his arrest. The Court below has dismissed the bail application. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant relying upon grounds raised in bail application submits that the applicant is innocent and falsely implicated in the present case. Further, he submits that the investigation relating to present applicant-accused is complete and is no more required by the Investigating Agency for investigation. He further assures that in case, the applicant-accused is required for [2025:RJ-JP:34827] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-8192/2025] further investigation, the applicant-accused will be available for such investigation. He also submits that the investigation/trial will take its own time and no purpose will be served by keeping the applicant-accused in custody. Learned counsel for petitioner further submitted on the basis of seizure of mobile by police instant case has been registered but there is no complainant on record to show that the petitioner accused was involved in any cyber crime activity. He further submitted that one more criminal case no. 567/2024 P.S. Ramgarh was registered against present petitioner but no evidence is available on record to show any complainant was cheated or money has been received from his account. 4. Aforesaid contentions were opposed by learned Public Prosecutor. 5. Heard learned counsel for the applicant-accused and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material placed on record. 6. On the basis of interception on suspicion Samundar Singh ASI present petitioner is involved in cyber criminal activity and after detaining and interrogation he registered a report against him. The petitioner accused is in custody since 21.05.2025 and charge-sheet has already been filed. Besides, present case one more criminal case is registered against the petitioner accused. Though, the police has not mentioned in its report and same is mentioned by learned trial court in impugned order. 7. Upon hearing the arguments and perusing the record, we have found that the applicant-accused is no more required in [2025:RJ-JP:34827] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-8192/2025] the investigation and he is in custody for quite some time. The further proceedings will take its own time, therefore, looking to entirety of facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, the Court deems it appropriate to grant bail to the applicant- accused 8. Thus, the instant bail application filed on behalf of applicants-accused Sajid Khan S/o Jumruddin, is hereby allowed and ordered to be released on bail upon furnishing a personal bond of ₹50,000/- with two sureties of like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court with the following conditions:- (i) The applicant-accused shall not tamper with evidence or influence the witness in any manner. (ii) The applicant-accused shall not indulge in any criminal activity and shall not repeat any criminal offence punishable under the Law. (iii) The applicant-accused shall attend the hearing of the Trial Court on the date fixed by the Trial court or as and when asked to appear before the Trial Court. (iv) In case of any violation of above conditions, the bail granted to the applicant-accused shall be liable to be canceled. 9. The Registry is directed to send a copy of this order to the Trial Court through E-mail. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J CHETNA BEHRANI /52