DR. BABU LAL SETHI, S/O SHRI K.L. SETHI v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CCP/693/2022 · 2025-09-20
Ganesh Ram Meena
Contempt Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 22745 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 22745 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:38920] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 693/2022
1. Dr. Babu Lal Sethi, S/o Shri K.l. Sethi, R/o 122/13, Agrawal Farm, Vijay Path, Jaipur. (Deceased) Though Lr 1/1, 1/2 And 1/3 1/1. Dr. Sanyam Prakash Jain S/o Late Dr. Babu Lal Sethi, R/o 122/13, Agarwal Farm, Vijay Path, Jaipur 1/2. Smt. Priti Jain D/o Late Babu Lal Sethi, R/o 524, Shanti Nagar, Durga Pura, Jaipur 1/3. Dr. Nidhi Jain D/o Late Babu Lal Sethi, R/o 37, Dream Home Colony, Tonk Road, Sanganer, Jaipur ----Petitioners Versus
1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary, Higher Education, Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. Smt. Shruti Tyagi, The Commissioner College Education, Shiksha Sankul, J.l.n. Marg, Jaipur.
3. Shri. G.l. Sharma, Secretary, Management Committee, Seth Moti Lal College, Jhunjhunu. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. S.P. Mathur For Respondent(s) : Mr. S.S. Naruka, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Order 20/09/2025
1. This contempt petition has been filed alleging non- compliance of the order dated 17.02.2022 passed in SBCWP No.1823/2017.
2.
Learned counsel appearing for the respondents submits that due payments alongwith interest have been paid to the petitioner. Learned AAG has also placed before this Court the copy of
[2025:RJ-JP:38920] (2 of 2) [CCP-693/2022] treasury bills and so also the order regarding sanction of the interest amount dated 22.09.2023. The said documents are taken on record.
3. In view of the statement made by the counsel appearing for the respondent-contemnors, this Court is of the opinion that the respondents have made substantial compliance of the order.
4. Accordingly, this contempt petition disposed of.
5. Notices discharged.
6. However, if the petitioner has any grievance as regards the paid amount, he may raise it before the appropriate forum.
7. It is also made clear that if any of the statement made by AAG is found to be incorrect, the petitioner may make an application for revival of this contempt petition.
(GANESH RAM MEENA),J Gaurav Srivastava/Satyendra/68