Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 22745 (GAU)

Vanramchhuangi v. State of Mizoram and 4 Ors.

I.A.(Civil)/39/2025 · 2025-03-04

Marli Vankung, Robin Phukan

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC030002652022 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : PIL/8/2022 Smt. Vanramchhuangi Aizawl VERSUS The State of Mizoram r/b the Chief Secretary to the Govt. of Mizoram, Aizawl and 4Ors. Aizawl2:The Secy. to the Govt. of Mizoram PWD Aizawl 3:The Principal Consultant GAD (Aviation Wing) Aizawl Aizawl 4:The Principal Conservator of Forest and Principal Secretary EF and CC Deptt. Govt of Mizoram Aizawl 5:The Proprietor M/s KR Construction Firm Aizawl Aizaw Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Joseph Lalchhanhima Renthlei Advocate for the Respondent : Addl A.G./G.A.,Mizoram for R2-R4 Linked Case : I.A.(Civil)/39/2025 Vanramchhuangi R/o Chaltlang Dawrkawn Page No.# 2/2 Aizawl Mizoram VERSUS State of Mizoram and 4 Ors. R/b Chief Secretary to the Govt. of Mizoram Aizawl Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Joseph Lalchhanhima Renthlei Advocate for the Respondent : Addl. AG/GA Mizoram B E F O R E HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MARLI VANKUNG HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE SHAMIMA JAHAN ORDER 10.06.2025 (Marli Vankung, J) Heard Mr. Joseph L. Renthlei, learned counsel for the petitioner, who prayed that since A/D card from the newly impleaded respondent No. 6 is not returned till date, he may be allowed to take steps for service of notice upon the newly impleaded resondent No. 6 through dasti mode. Prayer is allowed. The learned counsel for the petitioner to take steps for service of notice through dasti mode. Affidavit to that effect to be filed accordingly. List this matter after 2 (two) weeks. JUDGE JUDGE Comparing Assistant