[2025:RJ-JP:29525] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8203/2025 Sourav S/o Shri Mevaram, R/o Shankarpura, Police Station Di- holi, District Dholpur ( Presently Confined At District Jail Dholpur ) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Aditya Mishra Mr. Rajendra Prasad Jogi Ms. Rashmi Meena For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.S. Dhakar, PP Mr. Tapesh Agarwal, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 01/08/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.58/2025 registered at Police Station Diholi, District Dholpur for the offence punishable under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 333, 351(2), 351(3) & 74 of BNS. 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Learned counsel submits that alleged offences are triable by Magistrate. Charge- sheet has been filed. He submits that complainant of this case is sister-in-law of the petitioner and on account of property dispute, this false case has been instituted against the petitioner. Trial of the case will take considerable time in its conclusion and petitioner [2025:RJ-JP:29525] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-8203/2025] is in custody since his date of arrest. Further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioners, as also the fact that alleged offences are triable by magistrate; trial will take time in its conclusion as well as looking to the custody period, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow the bail application. 6. This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner – Sourav S/o Shri Mevaram shall be released on bail provided, he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. The observation made hereinabove is only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J GAUTAM JAIN /231