Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 22743 (HP)

USHA RAGHAV v. THE HPGB AND OTHERS

CWP/12997/2025 · 2025-09-05

Sandeep Sharma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.12997 of 2025 Date of Decision: 05.09.2025 _______________________________________________________ Usha Raghav …….Petitioner Versus Himachal Pradesh Gramin Bank and others … Respondents _______________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Jagat Pal, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. K. B. Khajuria, Advocate. ____________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge(oral): Mr. Kulbhushan Khajuria, learned counsel representing the respondents, on instructions, states that case of the petitioner for family pension is being considered as per Regulations 31 of Himachal Pradesh Gramin Bank (Officers and Employees) Service Regulation, 2010 and needful, in any eventuality, shall be done within a period of four weeks. 2. In view of the fair stand adopted by learned counsel representing the respondents, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the instant petition and accordingly, same is disposed of, with a direction to the respondents to ensure that necessary action upon the request of the petitioner for grant of family pension in terms of the 1Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 provisions, as detailed hereinabove, is taken expeditiously, preferably within a period of four weeks. Needless to say, petitioner herein shall be granted family pension from the due date. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of (Sandeep Sharma), Judge September 05, 2025 (shankar)