Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 22740 (JHR)

VISHAL LOHRA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./7621/2025 · 2025-09-08

Ambuj Nath

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2025:JHHC:26995 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 7621 of 2025 1. Vishal Lohra, aged about 20 years, son of Dinesh Lohra, resident of Village- Chandandih, P.O., P.S. & District- Latehar. 2. Shubham Lohra, aged about 20 years, son of Arjun Lohra, resident of Village- Bulhu, P.O.- Aan, P.S.- Chandwa, District- Latehar. …. Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand …. Opp. Party With B. A. No. 7625 of 2025 1. Rohit Kumar Lohra, aged about 20 years, son of Dwarika Lohra, resident of Village- Kura, P.O. & P.S.- Latehar, District- Latehar. 2. Vinay Gupta, aged about 20 years, son of Late Ramratan Prasad, resident of Village- Chatnahi, P.O. & P.S.- Latehar, District- Latehar. 3. Pramod Lohra @ Pramo Lohra, aged about 24 years, son of Mahendra Lohra, resident of Village- Kuriyam Kalan, P.O. & P.S.- Balumath, District- Latehar. …. Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand …. Opp. Party ------ CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMBUJ NATH ------ For the Petitioners : Mr. Jitendra Shankar Singh, Advocate Mr. Ajeet Kumar Singh, Advocate Mr. Rahul Aditya, Advocate Ms. Shubra Perween, Advocate For the Opp. Party : Mr. Rakesh Kumar Sinha, A.P.P. Mr. Satish Kumar Keshri, A.P.P. ----- 2/ 08.09.2025 Since, both these bail applications arise out of the same police case, they are heard together and are being disposed of by a common order. 2. Heard the parties. 3. Petitioners have been made accused in connection with Chandwa P.S. Case No. 112 of 2025 for the offences registered under Sections 111(3), 111(4), 111(7), 308(4), 308(7), 310(4), 310(5), 310(6), 61, 62, 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Sections 25(1-B)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act, pending in the Court of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Latehar. 4. On 26.05.2025 at about 4.30 am., Chandwa Police on the basis of confidential information that some criminals had assembled at Pannatanr forest area and they were making preparation for committing dacoity, raided the place of occurrence and apprehended these petitioners and co-accused persons. On search, three live cartridges were recovered from possession of petitioners Vishal Lohra, Shubham Lohra and Pramod Lohra @ Pramo Lohra, while from possession of petitioner Rohit Kumar Lohra, one country- made pistol was recovered and from possession of petitioner Vinay Gupta, nothing was recovered. 5. It was submitted that similarly situated co-accused Vikrant Singh @ Sikram has been granted bail by this Court earlier vide B.A. No. 6735 of 2025. 6. In view of the submission made above, I am inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. Accordingly, the petitioners, above named, are directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees twenty thousand) each, with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Latehar, in connection with Chandwa P.S. Case No. 112 of 2025. (Ambuj Nath, J.) R.Kr.