AKHALESH SON OF DHARMENDRA SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/8198/2025 · 2025-08-01
Anil Kumar Upman
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 22738 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 22738 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:29522] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8198/2025
1. Akhalesh Son Of Dharmendra Singh, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Village Rampura Bahas, Ps Deeg, District Deeg. ( At Present In Sub Jail Deeg)
2. Himmat Singh Son Of Ramkishor, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Village Nagla Dandu, Police Station Sadar Deeg Dis- trict Deeg. ( At Present Sub Jail Deeg) ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Jiya-Ur-Rahman For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.S. Dhakar, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN
Order 01/08/2025
1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS., on behalf of the petitioners, who have been arrested in connection with FIR No.313/2024 registered at Police Station Deeg, District Deeg for the offence punishable under Sections 189(2) & 109(1) of BNS & Section 3/25 of Arms Act.
2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioners that the accused-petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case.
Learned counsel submits that petitioners are not named in FIR. He submits that other co-accused persons who were named in FIR have already been granted benefit of bail by the learned trial court. Petitioners are in custody since their date of arrest and trial of the case will take considerable time. Further custody of the petitioners would not serve any fruitful purpose.
[2025:RJ-JP:29522] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-8198/2025]
3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by
learned counsel for the petitioners.
4. I have considered the contentions.
5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by both the parties, as also the fact that other co-accused persons who were named in FIR have already been granted benefit of bail by the learned trial court; trial will take time in its conclusion as well as looking to the custody period, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow the bail application.
6. This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioners – 1) Akhalesh Son Of Dharmendra Singh & 2) Himmat Singh Son Of Ramkishor shall be released on bail provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
7. The observations made hereinabove is only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner.
(ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J GAUTAM JAIN /229