Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 22733 (RAJ)

STATE OF RAJASTHAN v. RAJ KUMARI D/O SHRI HARPHOOL SINGH

SAW/835/2025 · 2025-09-01

Sanjeet Purohit, Sanjeev Prakash Sharma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:35014-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Special Appeal Writ No. 835/2025 In S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.8088/224 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Women And Child. Development Department, Government Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.). 2. The Director, Integrated Child Development Services, (Women And Child Development Department), 2 Jalpath, Gandhinagar, Jaipur (Raj.). 3. The Secretary, School Education Department, Government Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.). 4. The Director Secondary Education, Samta Nagar, Bikaner (Raj.). ----Appellants Versus 1. Raj Kumari D/o Shri Harphool Singh, Aged About 38 Years, R/o Vpo Kirdoli, Tehsil And District Sikar (Raj.) 2. The Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Its Secretary, State Institute Of Agriculture Management Premises, Durgapura, Jaipur (Raj.). ----Respondents For Appellant(s) : Mr. Manoj Sharma, AAG with Mr. S.M. Sharma, Adv. For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEET PUROHIT Order 01/09/2025 1. The challenge is to the order dated 30.05.225 passed by the learned Single Judge, which has been allowed in terms of the judgment passed in S.B. CWP No.19043/2012 titled as [2025:RJ-JP:35014-DB] (2 of 2) [SAW-835/2025] Moolchand Harijan Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. The issue was with regard to the validity of qualification awarded by the Rama College of Education, 224, Arya Nagar, Suraj Kund Road, Meerut (U.P.). The said Rama College of Education has been found to be duly recognized by the NCTE and also by the concerned SCERT, Lucknow i.e. State Board. 2. We also noticed that the present appeal has been filed after time barred by 331 days. On an opinion of State Level Standing Committee dated 16.04.2025, no other reasons are coming forward for decision to be taken after almost one year on merits as well as on limitation. We, therefore, dismiss the appeal accordingly. 3. Pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of. (SANJEET PUROHIT),J (SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA),J AVINASH GULERIA /52