[2025:RJ-JP:26299] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9706/2025 Shridhar University, Pilani-Chirawa Road, P.o. Box No. 13, Pilani, Rajasthan-333031, Through Its Nodel Officer, Shri Mohit Chhabra. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Depart- ment Of Social Justice And Empowerment, Government Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 2. The Director, Department Of Social Justice And Empower- ment Department, Civil Lines, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 3. The Deputy Director Scholarships, Social Justice And Em- powerment Department Government Of Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Himanshu Jain For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amitosh Pareek-Dy.G.C. JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 15/07/2025 1. The instant writ petition has been filed with the following prayers: a) By appropriate writ, order or direction, the order dated 27.12.2023, whereby, the petitioner univer- sity has been blacklisted from the scholarship por- tal, may also be quashed and set aside. The respon- dents may further be directed to restore the status of the petitioner university as it was existing prior to order dated 27.12.2023, b) By appropriate writ, order or direction, respon- dents may be directed to release scholarship of the students as admissible to them, for academic ses- sion of 2023-24. c) By appropriate writ, order or direction, the re- spondents be directed to implement the directions [2025:RJ-JP:26299] (2 of 3) [CW-9706/2025] issued by the Hon’ble High Court in S.B. Civil Writ petition No. 16/2025 and other connected matters. d) By appropriate writ, order or direction, respon- dents may be directed to award cost of rupees 50,000/- in lieu of harassment caused to the peti- tioner university and its students. e) Any other order which this Hon'ble court deems just and proper in the facts and circumstances of this case may kindly be passed in favour of the peti- tioner.” 2. By way of filing this petition, a challenge has been led to the impugned order dated 27.12.2023 passed by the respondents, by which the petitioner institution has been blacklisted for grant of scholarship. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for a mistake committed by one of the students, other students cannot be made sufferer. Counsel submits that after conducting inquiry, appropri- ate action has already been taken against the said student, there- fore under these circumstances, appropriate directions be issued to the respondents to allow other students to access the portal for getting scholarship. 4. Learned counsel for the respondents apprised this Court that after inspection of the petitioner institution, recommendation has been made to remove the hold of the petitioner institution and the said recommendation is under consideration before the higher au- thorities. 5. Considering the above factual aspect of the matter and look- ing to the fact that recommendation has been made in favour of the petitioner for removing the hold of the petitioner institution, the instant writ petition stands disposed of with direction to the respondents to take a decision upon the recommendation, expedi- [2025:RJ-JP:26299] (3 of 3) [CW-9706/2025] tiously as early as possible, preferably within a period of two weeks from today. 6. The stay application and all pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Ashu/24