Page No.# 1/3 GAHC030001142025 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/35/2025 Sh. Nixon Chakma and 63 Ors. S/o Bashi Dhan Chakma, R/o Kamalanagar-I, Lawngtlai Dist., Mizoram. VERSUS The Chakma Autonomous District Council r/b its Chief Executive Member and 3 Ors. Kamalanagar, Lawngtlai Dist., Mizoram. Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr B Lalramenga Advocate for the Respondent : Mr Lalchhanliana Khiangte for R1-3 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ROBIN PHUKAN ORDER 03.03.2025 Heard Mr. B. Lalramenga, learned counsel for the applicants. Also heard Mr. Lalchhanliana Khiangte, learned counsel for the respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 3 and Ms. Lalnunhlui, learned counsel for the respondent No. 4. 2. This interlocutory application, under Order 6 Rule 17 of the CPC, read with Section 151 of the CPC, is preferred by the applicants for amendment of the connected writ petition, being, WP(C) No. 9/2025 Page No.# 2/3 3. Mr. Lalramenga, learned counsel for the applicants submits that this application is preferred for amendment of the connected WP(C) No. 9/2025, to the extent of incorporating only one prayer i.e. ‘..and for setting aside and quashing of the impugned orders dated 26.08.2024 separately passed and issued against each of the petitioners’ by which the claims of the petitioners/applicants for payment of their monthly salaries from the Chakma Autonomous District Council were rejected. 4. Mr. Lalchhanliana Khiangte, learned counsel for the respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 3 and Ms. Lalnunhlui, learned counsel for the respondent No. 4 submit that they have no objection in the event of allowing this application by the allowing the applicants to incorporate the sentence ‘..and for setting aside and quashing of the impugned orders dated 26.08.2024 separately passed and issued against each of the petitioners’ in WP(C) No. 9/2025. 5. Having considered the submissions of learned Advocates of both sides and the facts and circumstances on the record, this Court is inclined to allow this application. Accordingly, it is provided that the prayer portion in the connected writ petition i.e. WP(C) No. 9/2025, be amended by incorporating the sentence i.e. ‘..and for setting aside and quashing of the impugned orders dated 26.08.2024 separately passed and issued against each of the petitioners’ in point No. (i) of the prayer/reliefs claimed by the petitioners/applicants at page No. 39 of the writ petition. 6. Mr. Lalramenga, learned counsel for the applicants shall amend the writ petition by replacing the page No. 39 of the same within a period of one week from today. Page No.# 3/3 7. In terms of above, this interlocutory application stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant