APHC010319822025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] THURSDAY,THE THIRD DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 16356/2025 Between: 1. THATIPARTHI VENKATASWAMY, NENKAIAH S/OAGE 61 YRS, R/O. CHERUVUKOMMUPALEM, PELLURU POST, ONGOLE MANDAL PRAKASHAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, SECRETARY(HOME),AP SECRETARIATE,VELAGAPUDI,GUNTUR DIST. PRADESH,REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL 2. THE SURINTENDENT OF POLICE, ONGOLE,PRAKASAM DIST. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, ONGOLE TALUKA POLICE STATION,PRAKASAM DIST. 4. RAMANA REDDY, S/0. GURAVA REDDY , AGED ABOUT 60 YRS, 5. SHANKAR REDDY, S/O RAMANA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 40 YRS, 6. GANESH REDDY, S/O RAMANA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 38YRS, RESPONDENTS 4-6 ARE MANAGEMENT OF THE ANDHRA KESARI B.EDCOLLEGE,AND R/O. CHERUVUKOMMUPALEM, PELLURU POST, ONGOLE MANDAL, PRAKASHAM DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a writ of mandamusdeclaring the action of the 3rd 2 Respondent/SHO on the petitioners report dated 21.04.2025, 24.03.2025 and 09.09.2024 MEE KOSAM Complaint to the 2ND respondent and in not registering the FIR against the respondents 4-6 who high handedly trying to trespass and in throwing garbage of larger quantity in the petetioners land by thretening the petetioner with dire consequences and creating forged affidavit and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased todirect the 3RD respondent to register the crime against the respondents No. 4-6 for their criminal acts of trying to trespass and creating forged documen, pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. PRASANNALA KANCHARLA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 3 The Court made the following Order: Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, appearing for the respondents 1 to 3. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is aggrieved by the inaction on the part of the 3rd respondent in registering the FIR on the complaint of the petitioner. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader, on written instructions, submits that, the police have conducted preliminary investigation under Section 173(3) of BNSS and have arrived at a conclusion that the matter is purely civil in nature and also advised the petitioner to settle the matter before the competent Civil Court. 4. Recording the same, the Writ Petition is disposed of, leaving it open for the petitioner to take steps, in accordance with law. No costs. 5. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date : 03.07.2025 BMS