Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH,
SHIMLA
CWP No. 12856/2025
Decided on: 08.08.2025
Sangita Kumari
Petitioner
Versus
State of H.P. & Ors.
.…Respondents. ………………………………………………………………………………. Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1
For the petitioner:
Mr. Tarun K. Sharma, Advocate.
For the respondents: Mr. Y.P.S. Dhaulta, Additional
Advocate General.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua , J
Mr. Y.P.S. Dhaulta, learned Additional Advocate General, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents.
With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the matter is taken up for disposal at this stage.
2.
Petitioner is serving as Shastri (OT) at Government Senior Secondary School Sanwal, District Chamba, H.P. which is stated to be a hard sub cadre area. Her case is that on completion of normal tenure at the aforesaid station, she preferred a representation on 08.07.2025 (Annexure P-1) to respondent No.2 seeking transfer to
1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2 a station of her choice, however, the said representation till date has not been decided by the aforesaid respondent/competent authority.
3.
Looking to the limited grievance of the petitioner, this writ petition is disposed of by directing respondent No.2/competent authority to consider and decide the aforesaid representation of the petitioner, in accordance with law, within a period of four weeks from today. The order so passed be also communicated to the petitioner. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua
Judge 08th August, 2025(rohit)