[2025:RJ-JP:37914] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8204/2025 Piyush Pareek S/o Raj Babu Pareek, Aged About 43 Years, Resi- dent Of House No. 35, Near Green Vatika Ram Mandir, Nangal Jaisa Bohra, Police Station Kardhani, Jaipur ( West) ( Presently Confined In Central Jail Jaipur) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Subodh Kumar Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.S. Dhakar, PP with Mr. Gaurav Gupta, Asstt. G.A. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 17/09/2025 1. This bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.315/2024 registered at Police Station Vaishali Nagar, District Jaipur (West) (Rajasthan) for offences punishable under Sections 406, 420, 409, 467, 468, 471 & 120B of IPC. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Counsel submits that alleged offences are triable by Magistrate. Counsel submits that on earlier occasion, FIR No.133/2024 with regard to the same plot was registered at Police Station Vaishali Nagar, District Jaipur (West) wherein arrest of the petitioner was made on 04.08.2024. Counsel submits that in that case, benefit of bail was granted to the [2025:RJ-JP:37914] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-8204/2025] petitioner by this Court vide order dated 18.02.2025. Counsel submits that now, petitioner has been arrested in the impugned FIR on 18.05.2025 and after investigation, charge-sheet has been filed in this matter. It is submitted that trial will take considerable time in its conclusion. Further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by counsel for the petitioner and submits that four other cases have been registered against the petitioner. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner, especially considering the fact that alleged offences are triable by Magistrate, so also the fact that alleged offences are based on documents which have been recovered by the Investigating Agency and trial will take considerable time in its conclusion as well as looking to the period of custody, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it fit and proper to allow this bail application. 6. The bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner- Piyush Pareek S/o Raj Babu Pareek shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any [2025:RJ-JP:37914] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-8204/2025] court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. It is made clear that the accused-petitioner shall not involve in any other offence(s) during currency of the bail and he shall mark his presence in first and third week of every month in the concerned police station, till trial is concluded. 8. Concerned SHO is directed to maintain a register recording the attendance of the petitioner. In case the petitioner fails to mark his presence in the concerned police station, the concerned SHO is directed to immediately report the matter to the concerned Court in this regard. 9. If any breach of these conditions is reported or come to the notice of the Court, the same shall alone be a reason for the trial court to cancel the bail granted to him by this Court. 10. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned SHO for necessary compliance. 11. The observations made hereinabove are only for decision of the bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J LALIT MOHAN /96