- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:23306 RFA No. 326 of 2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 326 OF 2017 (PAR) BETWEEN: SMT. BANU VIJAYDEV W/O LATE A.V.VIJAYDEV, AGED 66 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O DOOR NO.947, 13TH MAIN ROAD, 13TH CROSS, SREENAGARA, BANGALORE-560 050. …APPELLANT (BY SMT.DHANUSHRI.R., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. SOMASHEKHAR KASHIMATH., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. B.A.UDAYASHANKAR S/O B.S.ANADAMURTHY, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURIST, BELLUR VILLAGE, HETTUR HOBLI, SHUKRAVARSANTHE POST, SAKLESHPURA TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT, PIN-573 134. 2. B.A.RAVISHANKAR, S/O B.S.ANANDAMURTHY, OCC: AGRICULTURIST, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, SANTOSH NILAYA, ASHOKA ROAD, VIDHYANAGARA, Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:23306 RFA No. 326 of 2017 HASSAN-573 201. 3. B.A.SALARA W/O JAGADEESH, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK NO.102, VINAYAKA TERAS, 1ST FLOOR, 1ST MAIN ROAD, VINAYAKA LAYOUT, VIJAYANAGARA, BENGALURU, PIN-560 040. 4. B.A.PREMALATHA @ LATHA SADASHIVAPPA, W/O SADASHIVAPPA.G., AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK, D.NO.2657, 4TH CROSS ROAD, 8TH MAIN ROAD, HAL 2ND STAGE, INDIRANAGARA, BENGALURU-560 038. 5. RATHNA W/O B.A.UDAYASHANKAR, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK, BELLUR VILLAGE, HETTUR HOBLI, SHUKRAVARSANTHE POST, SAKLESHPURA TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT-573 134. 6. DEERAJ S/O B.A.UDAYASHANKAR, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, OCC: SERVICE, BELLUR VILLAGE, HETTUR HOBLI, SHUKRAVARSANTHE POST, SAKLESHPURA TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT-573 134. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. A.P.PULAKESHI., ADVOCATE FOR R1, 5 & 6; SRI. P.P.JAYAKUMAR., ADVOCATE FOR R2; R3 & 4 ARE SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED) - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:23306 RFA No. 326 of 2017 THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF THE CPC. THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER Sri.Dhanushri.R., counsel on behalf of Sri.Somashekahar Kashimath., for the appellant has appeared in person and submits that the appellant do not wish to prosecute the appeal. Counsel therefore, submits that the appeal may be dismissed as not pressed. When queried, counsel for the appellant submits that a conscious decision is taken by counsel on record and the appellant about non-pressing of the appeal. The oral submission made by counsel for the appellant is placed on record. The Regular First Appeal is dismissed as not pressed. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE MRP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 26