PUSHPABAI @ DAYAL BAI W/O HEMRAJ v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMA/282/2025 · 2025-07-03
Anil Kumar Upman
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 22707 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 22707 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. 282/2025
1. Pushpabai @ Dayal Bai W/o Hemraj, R/o Gram Sanmanpura, Police Station Khatoli, Tehsil Pipalda, District Kota (Raj.)
2. Hemraj @ Hemant S/o Ballabh, R/o Gram Sanmanpura, Police Station Khatoli, Tehsil Pipalda, District Kota (Raj.)
3. Ashish S/o Hemraj, R/o Gram Sanmanpura, Police Station Khatoli, Tehsil Pipalda, District Kota (Raj.) ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Jagdish Nagar For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.S. Dhakar, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN
Order 03/07/2025 The instant criminal misc. application under Section 528 of BNSS has been filed on behalf of Hemraj @ Hemant- applicant No.2 seeking additional time for surrendering before the learned trial court. Vide order dated 05.03.2025, bail application filed under section 482 of BNSS on behalf of applicant Nos. 1 and 3 was accepted however, bail application preferred by applicant No.2 was dismissed as withdrawn and he was given liberty to surrender before the trial court on or before 20.03.2025 and move a regular bail application. The trial court was also requested to consider and decide the same expeditiously in accordance with law.
(2 of 2) [CRLMA-282/2025] For the reasons mentioned in the application, same is allowed. It is directed that applicant No.2 shall surrender before the learned trial court on or before 11.07.2025 and move a regular bail application which is to be filed before 12:00 noon of working day. The Trial Court is requested to consider and decide it on the very same day in accordance with law, if possible. However, it is made clear that no interim protection from arrest is operating in favour of applicant No.2. Accordingly, this criminal miscellaneous application stands
disposed of.
(ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J Gautam Jain/184