Page 1 of 2. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK WP(C) No.33027 of 2025 Branch Manager, M/s.indusind Bank Ltd, Nayagarh Branch ..... Petitioner Represented by Adv. - Bikram Chandra Ghadei -versus- Sumitra Senapati ..... Opposite Parties Represented by Adv. - CORAM: MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR MOHAPATRA ORDER 12.02.2026 Order No. 02. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual /Physical Mode). 2. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner. Perused the writ application as well as the prayer made therein. 3. Being aggrieved by judgment dated 03.09.2025 passed by the learned District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Nayagarh in C.C. Case No.31 of 2025, the Petitioner has approached this Court by filing the present writ application. 4. By virtue of the impugned judgment dated 03.09.2025, the learned District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission has awarded compensation to the claimant is to be paid by the present Petitioner. On perusal of the pleadings it appears that the judgment of the District Commission has been challenged on the ground that excessive compensation has been awarded. On a careful Page 2 of 2. consideration of the submission made by the learned counsel for the Petitioner as well as a close scrutiny of the pleadings it appears that the present writ application is not maintainable, accordingly while disposing of the present writ application, liberty is granted to the Petitioner to approached the State Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission by filing in appeal along with application for condonation of delay, in the event any such application is filed for condonation of delay, the same shall be liberally considered as per loan by the State Commission. 5. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the writ application stands disposed of. ( A.K. Mohapatra) Judge Sisir Designation: Personal Assistant