- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:1494 RFA No. 953 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 953 OF 2023 (PAR) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. UMA D/O MADAIAH, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, 2. SMT VASANTHA D/O MADAIAH, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, BOTH ARE R/AT MUDDINAPALYA, VISHWANEEDAM POST, BENGALURU-560 091. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. JAGADEESH MUNDARGI., SRI.VIJAYAKUMAR.S., AND SRI.SANTHOSH.N., ADVOCATES) AND: 1. SRI. MADAIAH S/O LATE VENKATARAMANAPPA, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, 2. SRI MANJUNATHA S/O MADAIAH, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, 3. SRI NAGARAJA S/O MADAIAH, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, 4. SMT B.HEMA D/O BHEEMASENA BHANKAND, Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:1494 RFA No. 953 of 2023 AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, R/A NO 28, 9TH MAIN, REDDY STREET, BELLARY-583 101. 5. SRI S.N.SUBRAMANYA S/O LATE J.NANJUDAPPA, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, R/A NO 75, 57TH CROSS, 4TH BLOCK, RAJAJINAGAR, BENGALURU-560 010. 6. SMT L.MALATHI W/O SRI SANJAY.A.AMMIGERI, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, R/A C/O LINGAPPA, NO 279, 67TH CROSS, 5TH BLOCK, RAJAJINAGAR, BENGALURU-560 010. 7. SMT B.GAYATHRI D/O SRI K.BASAVARAJAIAH, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/A KODIHALLI VILLAGE, MADHURE HOBLI, DODDABALLAPURA TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT. 8. VIDYA D/O SRI BHEEMASENA BHANKAS, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, R/A NO 28, 9TH MAIN, REDDY STREET, BELLARY-583 101. 9. SMT. KORISHETTAR SIDALINGASWAMY GEETHA, W/O KORISHETTAR SIDALINGASWAMY, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, R/A NO 566, SMIG-B, BLOCK NO.36, SHIRKE APARTMENTS, V-PHASE, YELAHANKA NEW TOWN, BENGALURU-560 064. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:1494 RFA No. 953 of 2023 10. SRI N.R.BALAKRISHNA S/O N.RUDRAPPA, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, R/A NO.3, M.M.LANE, 3RD CROSS, COTTONPET, BENGALURU-560 053. 11. SMT D.SHAMAL BAI W/O SRI N.SURENDRA RAO, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, R/A NO 130/7, OPP KANNADA PRIMARY SCHOOL, VEERBHADRANAGAR, BENGALURU-560 085. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. A.MADHUSUDHANA RAO., ADVOCATE FOR C/R4 & 8; SRI. N.VAGEESHA., ADVOCATE C/R10) THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF THE CPC, 1908. THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the appeal was listed on 06.01.2025, on that day, finally a week’s time was granted to comply with the office objections, failing which the office was directed to list the appeal under the caption ‘for dismissal of appeal for non-compliance of office objections’ on 15.01.2025. - 4 - NC: 2025:KHC:1494 RFA No. 953 of 2023 The appeal is listed today under the caption ‘for dismissal of appeal for non-compliance of office objections’. Despite granting sufficient time, the appellants have not complied with the office objections. It appears that the appellants are not interested in prosecuting the appeal. In view of peremptory order dated 06.01.2025, the appeal is dismissed for non- compliance of office objections. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE MRP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 8