Adidala Benny Gnana Wesley Kumar, v. The Union of Inida,
WP/17302/2014 · 2025-03-21
Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 22698 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 22698 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010319942014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 17302/2014 Between: Adidala Benny Gnana Wesley Kumar ...PETITIONER AND The Union of India and others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. K V L NARASIMHA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA
2. A K JAYAPRAKASH RAO
The Court made the following:
2 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO
WRIT PETITION NO.17302 of 2014
ORDER:
Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the cause in the writ petition does not survive, it has become infructuous by afflux of time and hence, prayed to dismiss the writ petition. Learned counsel also endorsed the same on the bundle.
Recording the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
___________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date : 21.03.2025
SPP
3
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO
WRIT PETITION NO.17302 of 2014
Date : 21.03.2025
SPP