Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 22698 (AP)

Adidala Benny Gnana Wesley Kumar, v. The Union of Inida,

WP/17302/2014 · 2025-03-21

Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010319942014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 17302/2014 Between: Adidala Benny Gnana Wesley Kumar ...PETITIONER AND The Union of India and others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K V L NARASIMHA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA 2. A K JAYAPRAKASH RAO The Court made the following: 2 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO.17302 of 2014 ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the cause in the writ petition does not survive, it has become infructuous by afflux of time and hence, prayed to dismiss the writ petition. Learned counsel also endorsed the same on the bundle. Recording the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date : 21.03.2025 SPP 3 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO.17302 of 2014 Date : 21.03.2025 SPP