2025:HHC:27043 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Review Pet. No. 63 of 2025 Decided on: 11.08.2025 Om Parkash … Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others … Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 ___________________________________________________________________ For the petitioner : M/s Dinesh Thakur and Arun Kumar, Advocates. For the respondents : Mr. Rajat Chauhan, Assistant Advocate General for respondents-State. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Having heard learned Counsel for the review petitioner, this Court does not find any error apparent on the face of the record. 2. The contention of the petitioner that pursuant to the directions passed by this Court vide order dated 11.07.2025, rather than taking any action against respondent No. 4 therein, the agencies are initiating action against the petitioner for encroachment upon the Government land, is not an issue which can be gone into in a review petition or on the basis of said contention, it cannot be said that there is error apparent on the face of the record. If the petitioner is aggrieved by the action that has been taken by the Authorities, he can always file a writ petition against the same and if this is done so, then the Court will independently and 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 2025:HHC:27043 dispassionately look into the matter. 3. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed, however, it is clarified that dismissal of this review petition shall not be construed as an embargo, in case, the petitioner intends to approach this Court to challenge the action initiated by the authorities, in accordance with law. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of accordingly. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge August 11, 2025 (narender)