APHC010319792016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] THURSDAY,THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 38762/2016 Between: 1. SATYANARAYANA & 4 OTHERS,, S/O. LATE LAKSHMI NARASIMHA RAO, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, OCC: EX. MANAGER, KRISHNA DISTRICT COOP. CENTRAL BANK LTD., R/O. HOUSE NO. 1-61, CHANDRAGUDEM, MYLAVARAM MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 2. K. PURNACHANDRA RAO,, S/O. VENKATESWARA RAO, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, OCT: EX. MANAGER, KRISHNA DISTRICT COOP. CENTRAL BANK LTD., R/O. 21-512/2, LAKSHMIPURAM, DIMMALA CENTRE, MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 3. SHAIK BALA SAIDA,, S/O. SHAIK SAIDA, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, OCT: EX. ASSISTANT MANAGER, KRISHNA DISTRICT COOP. CENTRAL BANK LTD., RIO. H.NO. 31-6-2/A, ANUMOLU SESHAGIRIRAO STREET, MARUTHI NAGAR, VIJAYAWADA (URBAN), MACHAVARAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 4. SMT. V. JANAKI,, W/O. RAMA MOHANA RAO, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, EX. ASSISTANT MANAGER, KRISHNA DISTRICT COOP. CENTRAL BANK LTD., R/O. HOUSE NO. 1-191-11, G.MILL STREET, PEDAVA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 5. SHAIK MUNVAR SHARIFF,, S/O. SHAIK MASTAN SHARIFF, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, OCC: EX. MANAGER, KRISHNA DISTRICT COOP. CENTRAL BANK LTD., R/O. HOUSE NO. 32-26-84, ELURU ROAD, GPO ANDHRA BANK, MACHAVARAM, VIJAYAWADA (URBAN), KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. PRL SECY COOP GUN 3 OTHERS, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, COOPERATIVE DEPARTMENT, A.P. SECRETARIAT, 2 VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF COOPERATIVE REGISTRAR OF COOP, SOCIETIES, ANDHRA PRADESH, SHYAMALANAGAR, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE KRISHNA DISTRICT COOPERATIVE CENTRAL BANK LTD, REP. BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, KRISHNA DISTRICT, MACHILIPATNAM. 4. THE MANAGING COMMITTEE, KRISHNA DISTRICT COOP. CENTRAL BANK LTD., REP. BY ITS PRESIDENT, MACHILIPATNAM- 521 001, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an order or direction, more particularly a Writ in the nature of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents 3 and 4, in not taking any decision with regard to payment of salary and other allowances to the petitioners on par with the other employees continued in service beyond 58 years by virtue of the interim orders of this Honble Court in their favour till a decision has been taken by the 4th respondent-Board dated 29.7.2016, as illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory, unconstitutional, being in violation of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India, binding principles of the Honble Supreme Court and consequently direct the respondents 3 and 4, to pay the salary with all consequential benefits on par with the employees continued in service by virtue of the interim orders passed by this Honble Court made in W.P.M.P. No. 22424 of 2014 in W.P. No. 17786 of 2014, dated 29.6.2014, and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2016(WPMP 47761 OF 2016 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents 3 and 4, to take an appropriate decision with regard to payment of salaries and other benefits to the petitioners herein on par with the other employees continued in service by virtue of the Interim Orders passed by this Honble Court made in W.P.M.P. No. 22424 of 2014 in W.P. No. 17786 of 2014, dated 29.6.2014, beyond 58 years, in the ensuing Board meeting and submit a report before this Hontle Court, pending the disposal of the above Writ Petition. Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. SIVA S LANKA 3 Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR COOPERATION (AP) 2. V KISHORE The court made the following ORDER:- At the time of considering the matter, Sri Siva S Lanka, learned counsel for the petitioners appearing through virtual mode, submits that in view of the subsequent events taken place in the lis, the writ petition has become infructuous as no further orders are necessary. 2. Recording the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the writ petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, all pending applications shall stand closed. _______________________________ JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM Date: 14.08.2025 GVK 4 193 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION No.38762 of 2016 Date: 14.08.2025 GVK