Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 22685 (PNJ)

MUKESH KUMAR v. CEMENT CORPORATION FO INDIA ET

CWP/1483/2000 · 2025-05-20

Harsimran Singh Sethi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

105+214 1. CEMENT CORPORATION OF INDIA TARA CHAND AND ANOTHER 2. CEMENT CORPORATION OF INDIA MUKESH KUMAR AND ANOTHER 3. TARA CH CEMENT CORPORATION OF INDIA 4. MUKESH KUMAR CEMENT CORPORATION OF INDIA CORAM: Present: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision : 20 CM-7820 CWP-16102 of 1999 CEMENT CORPORATION OF INDIA VERSUS TARA CHAND AND ANOTHER CWP-16101 of 1999(O&M) CEMENT CORPORATION OF INDIA VERSUS MUKESH KUMAR AND ANOTHER CWP-1461 of 2000 TARA CHAND VERSUS CEMENT CORPORATION OF INDIA CWP-1483 of 2000 MUKESH KUMAR VERSUS CEMENT CORPORATION OF INDIA CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI None for the petitioners. Mr. D.P.S Bajwa, Advocate For respondent No.1 in CWP No.16102 of 1999. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision : 20-05-2025 7820-CWP-2025 in/and 16102 of 1999(O&M) CEMENT CORPORATION OF INDIA ........Petitioner(s) VERSUS ........Respondent(s) 16101 of 1999(O&M) CEMENT CORPORATION OF INDIA ........Petitioner(s) VERSUS ........Respondent(s) 1461 of 2000 (O&M) ........Petitioner VERSUS CEMENT CORPORATION OF INDIA ........Respondent(s) 1483 of 2000 (O&M) ........Petitioner VERSUS CEMENT CORPORATION OF INDIA ........Respondent(s) HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI in CWP No.16102 of 1999. ........Petitioner(s) ........Respondent(s) ........Petitioner(s) ........Respondent(s) ........Respondent(s) ........Respondent(s) HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI SAPNA GOYAL 2025.05.23 10:45 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CM-7820-CWP-2025 in/and CWP-16102 of 1999 (O&M) and other connected cases -2- HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J. (Oral) CM-7820-CWP-2025 in/and CWP No.16102 of 1999 1. This is an application for impleading the LRs of respondent No.1 in the present writ petition. 2. In view of the contents mentioned in the application, the same is allowed. The LRs of respondents are impleaded as party to the present petition only for the purpose of prosecuting the present case. 3. Registry is directed to make necessary changes in the memo of parties by impleading the LRs of the respondent No.1 as party to the present petition. CWP-16102 of 1999(O&M), CWP-1461 of 2000 (O&M), CWP-1483 of 2000 (O&M) and CWP-16101 of 1999(O&M) There is no representation on behalf of the petitioners. On the last date of hearing, no one has appeared on behalf of the petitioners. These petitions were filed about 26 years ago and there was no stay of the award. Probably, the petitioners are not interested in pursuing the present remedy any further. Dismissed for non-prosecution. Pending application, if any, also stands disposed of. Photocopy of this order be placed on the files of other connected cases. 20-05-2025 Sapna Goyal (HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) JUDGE NOTE: Whether speaking: YES Whether reportable: NO SAPNA GOYAL 2025.05.23 10:45 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document