Page No.# 1/3 GAHC030000442022 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : RFA/4/2022 Smt. Rinthari and Anr. Bethel Road, Khatla, Aizawl Mizoram 2: Sh. Thanglawt VERSUS Smt. Tlangthanpuii and 8 Ors Dinthar Veng, Aizawl Mizoram 2:Smt. Lalengi 3:Sh. Lalmuanpuia 4:The State of Mizoram 5:Secretary to the Govt of Mizoram Revenue Department 6:The Director Land Revenue and Settlement Department Govt of Mizoram 7:Deputy Commissioner Aizawl District 8:Deputy Director Govt of Mizoram Land Revenue and Settlement Department Page No.# 2/3 9:Assistant Settlement Officer-I Aizawl Distric Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr J C Lalnunsanga Advocate for the Respondent : Mr. Joseph Lalchhanhima Renthlei for R1 ORDER BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NELSON SAILO 06.02.2025 Heard Mr. Roshan Subedi, learned counsel for the appellant and Mr. Lalrinchhana, learned counsel for the respondent No. 1. Also heard Ms. Caroline K. Lungawipuii, learned Govt. Advocate for the respondent Nos. 4-9. [2.] This is an appeal filed by the appellants against the Judgment & Order dated 15.12.2020 and the Decree passed on the same day by the Senior Civil Judge-II, Aizawl in Civil Suit No. 14/2005. [3.] Mr. Roshan Subedi, learned counsel for the appellants and Mr. Lalrinchhana, learned counsel for the respondent No. 1 submits that the rival parties have come to a compromise agreement in writing on 13.12.2024, which is the effect that the respondent No. 1 will pay a sum of Rs. 8 lakhs to the appellants and the appellants on their part will withdraw the instant appeal without liberty to file afresh. Mr. Roshan Subedi, learned counsel submits that Page No.# 3/3 the respondent No. 1 has paid the appellants the agreed sum of money and therefore, the appellants no longer would like to pursue the appeal but withdraw the appeal. [4.] Mr. Lalrinchhana, learned counsel for the respondent No. 1 agrees to the submission of Mr. Roshan Subedi that an agreement has been reached between the parties and the respondent No. 1 has already paid the amount as undertaken in the said agreement. [5.] Mr. Caroline K. Lungawpuii, learned Govt. Advocate submits that in view of the compromise reached between the parties, the official respondents has nothing much to say in the matter. [6.] In view of above, the appeal stands disposed of as withdrawn. A photo copy of the Deed of Compromised Agreement signed by the parties concerned dated 13.12.2024 is submitted to the Court and is retained in the file and marked as ‘X’ for identification. JUDGE Comparing Assistant