Sh. Zohmangaiha and 7 Ors v. State of Mizoram and 11 Ors
RFA/27/2014 · 2025-10-15
Marli Vankung
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 22684 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 22684 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/2 GAHC030000032014
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : RFA/27/2014 Sh. Zohmangaiha and 7 Ors Chhinga Veng, Aizawl
VERSUS State of Mizoram and 11 Ors Chief Secretary, GOM, Aizawl
Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr C Lalramzauva, Sr. Adv. Advocate for the Respondent : Addl. AG/GA, Mizoram for R1-R3
BEFORE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MARLI VANKUNG ORDER 16.10.2025 Heard Mr. C.Lalramzauva, learned Senior counsel for the petitioner, assisted by Ms. Ruth Lalruatfeli, learned counsel. Also, heard Mr. Victor L. Ralte, learned counsel for the Private respondents. 2. The learned counsels for both the parties have submitted that the parties have come to amicable settlement before the Lok Adalat on 13.09.2025 wherein, the instant case was registered as LA (Post) No. 8/2024. The learned counsels for both the parties submit that since the parties have come to amicable settlement at the Lok Adalat, the instant Regular First Appeal No.
Page No.# 2/2 27/2014 may be closed and disposed of. 3. On considering the submissions made by the learned counsels for both the parties, this court has perused the award made by the Lok Adalat in LA (Post) No. 8/2024 dated 13.09.2025. It is seen that, the Award has been recorded in the vernacular language (Mizo) and that all the parties in the instant Regular First Appeal have affixed their signature against the terms of the Award in the presence of the consolators, Mr. Laldinpuia Tlau, Judicial Officer and Mr. T. Lalnunsanga, Advocate. This court has also perused the terms of settlement reached by the parties in the Lok Adalat wherein, the award has considered all the aspects of the dispute between the parties. It is seen that at para 5 of the Award some of the parties have agreed to pay certain amount money in lieu of some of the disputed landed areas. It is seen that the parties have also agreed not to make any other claim which is not in accordance with the terms of the Award dated 13.09.2025. This court on perusal of the terms of the amicable settlement reached by the parties find the Award dated 13.09.2025 to be reasonable and in accordance with law. 4.
Accordingly, since the parties have come to amicable settlement at the Lok Adalat on 13.09.2025, this court finds it fit to disposed the Regular Fist Appeal of 27/2014 in terms of the Award reached by the parties and the copy of the Award dated 13.09.2025 is to be marked as ‘X’ and made a part of the record for reference. Regular First Appeal No. 27 of 2014, thus stands closed and disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant