2025:HHC:29049 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA Exe. Pt. No. 1087 of 2024 Decided on : 27.08.2025 Surinder Singh Chauhan. …Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. …Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. Anil Chauhan, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal, Additional Advocate General. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in terms of the directions passed in the writ petition, filed by the petitioner, an order was passed by the competent Authority and due relief was granted to the petitioner. However, in terms of the Notification dated 27.02.2025, appended with the reply, now the said relief has been taken over, which act according to the respondents is arbitrary. 2. This Court is of the considered view that in the 1Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 2025:HHC:29049 present proceedings, this issue being raised by the petitioner, cannot be delved into. 3. Accordingly, these proceedings are closed but with the observation that the petitioner, if he is so advised, may assail Notification dated 27.02.2025, by way of an appropriate writ petition. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand disposed of accordingly. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge August 27, 2025 (Shivank Thakur)