Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 22679 (RAJ)

WAJID S/O ATRA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/9664/2025 · 2025-07-30

Anoop Kumar Dhand

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:29019] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9664/2025 Wajid S/o Atra, Aged About 45 Years, R/o Nichalla Mohalla Dhoj (17), Dhuj Faridabad, Hr 121004 Owner Of Vehicle Goods Carrier Registration No. Hr38Ab2236. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Transport Department Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan, Through Secretary. 2. Department Of Mining And Geology, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan, Through Joint Secretary. 3. Commissioner, Transport Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur. 4. Regional Transport Officer, Rto Bharatpur, District Bharatpur (Rajasthan). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr.Mritunjay Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr.S. S. Naruka, AAG with Mr.Sachin Singh Rathore & Mr.Tanishq Aditya Parmar JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 30/07/2025 1. By way of filing this writ petition, the petitioner is seeking direction against the respondents to revoke the suspension of the registration certificate of the petitioner’s vehicle. 2. At the outset, learned counsel for the respondent-State submits that the order of suspension of petitioner’s vehicle has been revoked by the District Transport Officer, Bharatpur (for short, “the DTO”) and an intimation in this regard has been sent [2025:RJ-JP:29019] (2 of 2) [CW-9664/2025] to the DTO, Faridabad, Haryana vide letter dated 23.07.2025. Counsel submits that the portal of Department of Transport is reflecting that some application subitted by the petitioner before the DTO, Faridabad is lying pending since 2024. Counsel submits that DTO, Bharatpur has nothing to do with the suspension of registration certificate of the petitioner’s vehicle as the same has already been withdrawn on 23.01.2025. 3. In view of the above factual aspect of the matter, no direction is required to be issued to the DTO, Bharatpur. In case, the petitioner is still feels aggrieved with regard to the suspension of his vehicle’s registration at DTO, Faridabad, then he would be at liberty to avail the remedies available to him under the law. 4. Accordingly, the instan writ petition stands disposed of. Stay application and all pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Aayush Sharma /50