SARJAN SINGH S/O BHARAT SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/8244/2025 · 2025-07-14
Ganesh Ram Meena
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 22674 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 22674 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:25997] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Misc. 3rd Bail Application No. 8244/2025 Sarjan Singh S/o Bharat Singh, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Bishan Kheda Police Station Manohar Thana, District Jhalawar (Raj.) ( At Present Confined In Sub-District Jail Aklera, District Jhalawar, ( Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Manish Kumar Yadav For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Punia, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Order 14/07/2025
1. This third bail application has been filed by the petitioner under Section 483 of the B.N.S.S. arising out of FIR No.315/2024, registered with the Police Station Manohar Thana, District Jhalawar for offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 3(5) & 352 of BNS.
2. Heard and considered.
3. The second bail application of the accused petitioner was dismissed vide order dated 24.02.2025 after taking into
consideration the specific allegation of causing injury to the injured Biram by sharp weapon on the forehead which has been opined to be dangerous to life by the doctor.
4.
Learned counsel for the accused petitioner submits that the doctor, who has given opinion with regard to injury, has been examined before the trial Court.
[2025:RJ-JP:25997] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-8244/2025]
5. In the statement of PW.2 Dr. Arun Somani, he has stated that the injury caused to the injured Biram has been opined by him as dangerous to life.
6. Taking into consideration the specific allegation against the accused petitioner of causing injury on the forehead of the injured Biram so also the evidence of the Doctor, who has given opinion that the said injury is dangerous to life, this Court is not inclined to enlarge the accused petitioner on bail.
7. Accordingly, this third bail application is dismissed.
(GANESH RAM MEENA),J Gaurav Srivastava /4