Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 22674 (GAU)

NO. JC-354554L NAIB SUB/CIPHER BIRENDER KUMAR SINGH AND 7 ORS. v. AJAY KUMAR BHALLA AND ANR.

Cont.Cas(C)/16/2020 · 2025-06-03

Kardak Ete

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010202622024 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/16/2020 NO. JC-354554L NAIB SUB/CIPHER BIRENDER KUMAR SINGH AND 7 ORS. PRESENTLY SERVING AT 17TH ASSAM RIFLES LOCKHART ASSAM C/O 99 APO PIN- 932017. 2: NO. JC-354888A NAIB SUBEDAR/ CIPHER HASNAIN KHAN PRESENTLY SERVING AT 40TH ASSAM RIFLES C/O 99 APO PIN 932040. 3: NO. JC- 354951K NAIB SUBEDAR/ CIPHER PRATAP SINGH PRESENTLY SERVING AT 7TH ASSAM RIFLES C/O 99 APO PIN 92007. 4: JC- 353959K NAIB SUBEDAR/ CIPHER SREEKANTAN NAIR K PRESENTLY SERVING AT HEAD QUARTER DIRECTOR GENERAL ASSAM RIFLES SHILLONG MEGHALAYA PIN- 932011. 5: JC- 353908W NAIB SUBEDAR/ CIPHER RAKESH KUMAR PRESENTLY SERVING AT 26TH ASSAM RIFLES C/O 99 APO PIN 932026. 6: S/354461W WARRANT OFFICER/ CIPHER XAVIER VS PRESENTLY SERVING AT 28TH ASSAM RIFLES C/O- 99 APO PIN 932028. Page No.# 2/3 7: AR-241F SECOND-IN-COMMAND G. RAVEENDRAN PILLAI PRESENTLY SERVING AT HEAD QUARTER 7TH SECTOR ASSAM RIFLES C/O- 99 APO. 8: JC- 353729W SUB/ CIPH SATYAPAL PRESENTLY SERVING AT 33RD ASSAM RIFLES C/O- 99 APO PIN 932033. VERSUS AJAY KUMAR BHALLA AND ANR. SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF INDIA MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS NORTH BLOCK NEW DELHI- 110001. 2:LIEUTENANT GENERAL SUKHDEEP SANGWAN DIRECTOR GENERAL ASSAM RIFLES SHILLONG MEGHALAYA PIN- 793011. ------------ Advocate for : MR. B PATHAK Advocate for : MS. RITA DEVI appearing for AJAY KUMAR BHALLA AND ANR. BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE O R D E R Date : 04.06.2025. Heard Mr. V. Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Ms. R. Devi, learned CGC. By placing the copy of the order dated 16.02.2024, issued by the Lt. Col, OIC Legal Cell, it is stated at the Bar that the order of this Court dated 28.08.2019, has been duly complied with. Page No.# 3/3 Having perused the above order, it is seen that the order of this Court dated 28.08.2019, passed in WP(C) No.6128/2019, has been duly complied with. Accordingly, this Contempt Petition stands closed and disposed of. A copy of the communication dated 16.02.2024 is kept in the record by marking the same as document “X”. JUDGE Comparing Assistant